Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain
In Iowa, he would likely be arrested for attempted murder. There is no castle doctrine or anything of the sort here (unfortunately), so once they are trying to leave the threat is considered gone; he would be in a world of hurt for firing on the van.

Not sure exactly how I feel on that one... On one hand, once you fire at me I would have no mental problem returning the favor. On the other hand, his life at that moment was not in imminent danger since they were fleeing the scene.

Not sure of Georgia law, the article made no mention.

2 posted on 08/04/2009 5:11:22 AM PDT by cspackler (There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cspackler

I dont know the law, but given the opportunity I hope,I would have done exactly what this man did.

The only reason this man is alive is because the thieves couldnt shoot well. In my mind that means he has every right to try to kill them.


4 posted on 08/04/2009 5:15:34 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cspackler
In Iowa, he would likely be arrested for attempted murder. [....]Not sure exactly how I feel on that one. On one hand, once you fire at me I would have no mental problem returning the favor. On the other hand, his life at that moment was not in imminent danger since they were fleeing the scene.

The scum had his property and had already tried to take his life. Laws need to be changed.

6 posted on 08/04/2009 5:26:36 AM PDT by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cspackler

They shot him in the arm before he had a weapon.
I would say that showed intent to kill him,
and he was in his rights to self defense.


11 posted on 08/04/2009 5:38:38 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, save Bowman for later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cspackler
Not sure exactly how I feel on that one...

Blood on the interior, bullet holes in the windshield and maybe the body of the vehicle. Lots of work needs to be done on that van.

The perps wanted his money, not the van. He should have just let them take it. Vans don't garner respect when cruisin' the hood so most likely they would have eventually dumped it.....

I put a sign on my car once that said "Please steal this car!" Some guy put a $5 bill with a note attached to it under my wiper blade saying "No way dude! Here's some cash to help you start saving for a new one....."

14 posted on 08/04/2009 5:46:28 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Who's your Long Legged MacDaddy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cspackler

By shooting, he may have prevented the criminals from speeding away in the van and possibly injuring/killing other motorists or repeating the crime. I live in Georgia (but love East Tenn.!) and this one has me going “Way to go!” Our news broadcasts oftentimes are nothing more than a reading of crimes and murders that have occurred.


15 posted on 08/04/2009 6:13:44 AM PDT by 1951Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cspackler

I am also in Iowa and I am sure of how I feel about this. The man is a hero and was right to shoot the perps, even if they were fleeing. A vehicle is a deadly weapon, particularly when being weilded by a criminal who has already shown he has a desire to kill you, as evidenced by his shooting you moments before.

The man needs a larger gun. If size is a consideration then he should get a pocket .40, Kahr makes nice ones. Maybe something in a Kel-Tec.


18 posted on 08/04/2009 3:10:51 PM PDT by Dayman (My 1919a4 is named Charlotte. When I light her up she has the voice of an angel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson