[1000 silverlings]

Not necessarily. Notice that the only signature on both docs is the Deputy Registar, in the Bomford one, the guy actually in New South Wales signed it. The other two are typed in, and even incorrectly maybe by the person who filled in the form. These two Registrars could have been English, not colonial. The year is coincidently(?) 1964 but notice all the other dates are plausible. This could just be the formality, such as you find on California documents for example "Secretary of State", which willl vary depending on who the SOS is in any given year.

The birth cerificate forms are by government printers so the shilling and pence don't reflect the colony. As for the other similar numbers on the form, there may be an answer for that.

[Windflier]

This could just be the formality, such as you find on California documents for example "Secretary of State", which willl vary depending on who the SOS is in any given year.

Hmmm.... you just may have something there.

Still, there's the little problem of the book and page numbers being identical. Can't get my head around that.

Being that the Bomford image disappeared so fast, and the fact that there appears to be tampering with the images at Scribd and Orly's site, I'm getting strong radar pings of misdirection and covert ops by someone.