These aren’t similar. They’re identical.
Same form number. Same price. Same last name for the Registrar and District Registrar. Same book. Same page.
+++++++++++++++++=
If you do a side by side comparison, the only small differences are the folds...but all the information is exactly alike or very, very similar...doesn’t look good for Taitz’/Keyes’ case, if that’s all they’ve got.
Again, the onus is still on bammy to produce, in my book.
Right but that’s true regardless.
It’s clear to me at least that they’re trying to distract us from something...to deter us from looking...to make us look silly...etc.
The thing is, I think our response was entirely responsible. We were presented a document and we worked it inside and out until we hit a brick wall of irrefutable evidence that strongly suggests (if not demands) that we acknowledge this document to be a fake. Now that we know, we let this one go...but that does not in anyway mean we walk away from this issue.
He’s lying. He’s hiding. He’s trying to keep us from finding out about his past.
We have to be vigilant and press on even while we’re labeled by both the left and the right. We also have to be willing to walk away from a specific incident when it’s proven to be a fake, like this one has.