[Kandy]

Calpernia,

This may be out of sequence here but how are the two differing documents you’ve presented here differing in time sequence as your own discovery goes? I mean, if Orly’s example is considered to be the original since apparently she was the one to present it and must have the paper copy, would you say then that hers should be the KF one or would you say that she doesn’t hold the original OR ... that she did show the KF original on her site to begin with and that IT was tampered with and then WND merely duplicated that tampered one on their site. Just asking since I don’t know in what position is that horse and cart here. And supposedly persons have recorded the KF “original” quite early on and only later noticed that the source of that KF one had a different, EF one, listed.

Hopefully, just my questions here haven’t confused things even more!! Thanks.

[Calpernia]

The KF one I have a screen capture one of came from the SCRBD link on the original long post.

[palmer]

The early ones (from Sunday AM) with an "E.F." that looked like "K.F." were poorly saved (too much jpeg compression) from Orly's site. Nothing changed there AFAIK and certainly nothing changed at the court website that has been linked here multiple times. That shows the "E.F." very clearly. Also "O" not "6".

This entire thread was due to some quick but unfortunate file saving Sunday AM.