Did you have time to think about my post. Thanks.
I was thinking about it and letting it sink in.
It had occurred to me to question which came first, the chicken or the egg... Kenya or Australia. There are too many coincidences and I just don't believe in coincidences.
I also don't believe in totally stupid but very skilled forgers who would make an Obama BC proxy by copying almost verbatim the officials' names, Volume and Page Numbers, on an Australian BC proxy. That simply beggars belief.
Assuming our forger has the moxie to do such a professional job in the first place, I would assume that he would have the moxie to file off the serial numbers of his stolen exemplar. Why keep so much the same since the entire thing had to be re-created anyway. It would be dead bank easy to change the names to something common in Kenya at the period.
The only way that makes sense is if the forgery is going the OTHER WAY: that the forger is creating something extremely obscure, something that will be placed deeply buried on the internet—that can be accidentally discovered at the last minute just in time to impeach the real document. To do that our forger deliberately duplicates many of the features and details of the original target document. Since no one is interested in some nice guy in Australia and would have no need to impeach HIS BC, but that it would be very important to impeach the Obama document, then my logic says that the Australian BC must be the forgery, made with the intent of proving the original false.
I also have a real problem with someone deciding to seek image similar to the Kenyan document and just browsing the 3,090,000 Birth Certificate thumbnails on Google, suddenly stumbles on the Australian document... recognizing the similarity on a 1 inch thumbnail. Right, Sure. Do I want to buy a bridge to Brooklyn? Try it. See how quickly your eyes glaze over and you zone out.
Your daughters findings certainly seem to corroborate that scenario.