Saquin is right!
The two images that are in the article of this thread are mine, which is 856 x 614 = 525,584 pixels and 87,414 bytes. The second, captured by someone else which is a supposed modified copy, is 1000 x 900 = 900,000 pixels and 298,380 bytes.
The second is only 71% larger in terms of pixels, but the number of bytes necessary to provide the detail in that larger picture is 341% larger, almost FIVE times the detail data. No wonder there is a difference.
Saquin is full of shit. Look around you. There are many dozens of freepers on this trhead that see a K as distinctive as the nose on your face.
Try 685 for the negative, if that helps.
So how did that make a “K” turn into a “E”? There should be differences in more numbers and letters between the two images if that’s the case. The “K” is as clear as can be under higher magnification, and is completely distinct from the “E” in the second photo.
Saquin is right!
_______________
Saquin isn’t right about anything and is a troll and got zotted.