Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant; STARWISE; jveritas; DJ MacWoW
It took me forever to read this thread. I agree that Bomford and Kenyan BC cannot co-exist. However, as we review the bidding. Orly has a physical copy of the Kenyan BC, any document examiner worth anything could and should be able to see if this was offset, letterpress, ink jet or laser. That is what is so powerful about having the document rather than just seeing an image. It is very likely that this document, the Kenya BC, was letter press, hard to imagine it even offset in Kenya in 1964. This should show like a sore thumb under magnification. And, photoshop is not so good getting lead type into place, at least I don't have a lead type plugin for mine.

Bomford has the printers mark at the bottom.. but Bomford only exists for us as an electronic document, forever beyond the reach of a loop. It is the more likely fake, and they should have to cough the original up, more so, lots of Aussie BC's are being posted here and none is similar to Bomford.

The answer is in finding a Kenyan comparable, WND claims one and the should produce it immediately.

1,083 posted on 08/03/2009 9:00:00 PM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 848 | View Replies ]


To: dalight

you sure she has a ‘physical copy’?

I thought it was just the image


1,085 posted on 08/03/2009 9:02:24 PM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1083 | View Replies ]

To: dalight

“WND claims one and the should produce it immediately”

BINGO!


1,088 posted on 08/03/2009 9:03:29 PM PDT by RatsDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1083 | View Replies ]

To: dalight
This is it! Since the court has the real hardcopy. They can check if it was produced with offset or letterpress printing.

It took me forever to read this thread. I agree that Bomford and Kenyan BC cannot co-exist. However, as we review the bidding. Orly has a physical copy of the Kenyan BC, any document examiner worth anything could and should be able to see if this was offset, letterpress, ink jet or laser. That is what is so powerful about having the document rather than just seeing an image. It is very likely that this document, the Kenya BC, was letter press, hard to imagine it even offset in Kenya in 1964. This should show like a sore thumb under magnification. And, photoshop is not so good getting lead type into place, at least I don't have a lead type plugin for mine.

Bomford has the printers mark at the bottom.. but Bomford only exists for us as an electronic document, forever beyond the reach of a loop. It is the more likely fake, and they should have to cough the original up, more so, lots of Aussie BC's are being posted here and none is similar to Bomford.

The answer is in finding a Kenyan comparable, WND claims one and the should produce it immediately.

Thanks you dalight :-)

1,105 posted on 08/03/2009 9:13:45 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1083 | View Replies ]

To: dalight; LucyT

A significant post by dalight

Ping the list. :-)


1,110 posted on 08/03/2009 9:16:13 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1083 | View Replies ]

To: dalight

Good thinking.


1,112 posted on 08/03/2009 9:19:19 PM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1083 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson