Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dalight

you sure she has a ‘physical copy’?

I thought it was just the image


1,085 posted on 08/03/2009 9:02:24 PM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1083 | View Replies ]


To: cycle of discernment

sorry I see the wnd story does say she has a ‘copy’


1,089 posted on 08/03/2009 9:03:36 PM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1085 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment
I thought it was just the image

I am certain of it, but lord knows which post this was in. I will have to run back and find it if I want to provide the link and I have work to do yet tonight. So, arrf.

But, Orly couldn't submit the document as evidence if it wasn't physically in her possession. An image of a document is useless in any court in the US.

The text I read also stated it had been examined by a document examiner. This person wouldn't be able to attest to the data printed on the document but they would be able to rule out modern printing, and have an opinion of the age of the paper and whether it had been artificially aged.

I am sure anyone would do this first, would Orly? I would guess yes. But, still, you have to check the rest and she is. What can you say.

1,098 posted on 08/03/2009 9:08:31 PM PDT by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1085 | View Replies ]

To: cycle of discernment
you sure she has a ‘physical copy’?

I thought it was just the image

The Federal Court has it.

1,106 posted on 08/03/2009 9:14:59 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1085 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson