“Judge King probably told Ann to produce a birth certificate before or at trial”
________________
This is not true. There would be no reason for the judge to ask for a birth certificate unless the father was refuting paternity.
This is a more logical time line:
1). Hopeful conspiracy theorists latch on to a “birth certificate/eligibility” scenario contrived by a Hillary supporter named Berg from Pennsylvania.
2). Months pass with several false starts and sputters due to a headline hungry immigrant from California who holds a law degree from an on-line school.
3). Several weeks ago commotion is caused when a ‘birth certificate from Kenya, reported to be Obama’s, goes on sale on e-Bay, but is pulled as it cannot be verified.
4). Headline hungry e-lawyer rekindles commotion with a Birth Certificate (convenient weeks after the e-Bay fraud).
5). FR gets excited but then cooler heads begin threads suggesting that the document is obviously bogus, desparately trying to regain credibility for mainstream conservatives.
6). Conspiracy nuts continue fantasizing about pseudo-evidence, could be documents and divorce proceedings.
Judge King would have requested Obama Jr's mother (Ann Dunham) provide a copy of the birth because:
1) The judge must know who the parents are before he awards child support
2) The judge must know who the parents are before he awards custody
Go away troll. Don't waste your time on "Conspiracy nuts" ...