Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: awake-n-angry; LucyT
There would be no reason for the judge to ask for a birth certificate unless the father was refuting paternity.

Judge King would have requested Obama Jr's mother (Ann Dunham) provide a copy of the birth because:

1) The judge must know who the parents are before he awards child support

2) The judge must know who the parents are before he awards custody

Go away troll. Don't waste your time on "Conspiracy nuts" ...

249 posted on 08/03/2009 10:25:10 AM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]


To: BP2

You, with all due respect, are delusional.

The judge settles disputes. If the plaintiff asks for custody and the respondent does not contest, then the plaintiff will get custody. If the plaintiff asks for child support and there is no argument against posed by the respondent, the the plaintiff is awarded child support (as calculated by the court per financial filing on both sides). No disputes, no need for the court to invent one.

It is common for a man to pay support for children that are not his, only because he supported the children during the marriage (this subject has been discussed extensively on this forum).

Birth certificates are not evidence of paternity. Often a man is named as a father without his knowledge or consent. The court would not use a birth certificate for this purpose.


250 posted on 08/03/2009 1:38:24 PM PDT by awake-n-angry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson