I understand your point but by that logic The Bush campaign would have been behind Rathergate memos. Let’s see if this actual BC turns up and is examined forensically.At least they didn’t use Word in creating it.
No not really. I mean, sure, if both situations are completely equivalent, you might have a point.
But the thing is, I don’t suspect Dan Rather or any of the fools behind Rathergate ever believed that the report would be questioned...or if they did, I doubt they felt it would go as far as it did. They expected it to be swallowed whole cloth and it was...until it was proven to be a fake.
If the Bush people leaked fake documents in order to sucker the left, then again, the Rather crew were morons for not fully vetting the material before reporting on it and putting the Rather stamp of authenticity on it.
It doesn’t need to be forensically examined. Unlike his photo shop BC, this document lists Registration #, Book #, and page #, just authenticate those with Kenyan Gov’t, and you’re done.
Also note, there are the name of a witness, Doctor, and clerk that can be verified, as well.
That’s reaching ... no equivalency at all or relevance.