Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lower55

1. Natural born citizen is not Constitutionally defined. We do not have precedent to establish the meaning of this.

2. If natural born citizen means someone who does not need to be naturalized, then there is not and never has been a requirement for both parents to be citizens.

3 - What argument do you make for a requirement for two parents ?


397 posted on 07/30/2009 11:17:14 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies ]


To: buwaya
Natural born citizen is not Constitutionally defined. We do not have precedent to establish the meaning of this.

Not true. Even zero knows that - thus the cover up.
401 posted on 07/30/2009 11:18:57 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies ]

To: buwaya

“1. Natural born citizen is not Constitutionally defined. We do not have precedent to establish the meaning of this.

2. If natural born citizen means someone who does not need to be naturalized, then there is not and never has been a requirement for both parents to be citizens.

3 - What argument do you make for a requirement for two parents ?”

Wrong. Wrong. and, Wrong. Read the source in one of the above posts. Bet you won’t.


404 posted on 07/30/2009 11:19:55 PM PDT by Lower55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson