“1. Natural born citizen is not Constitutionally defined. We do not have precedent to establish the meaning of this.
2. If natural born citizen means someone who does not need to be naturalized, then there is not and never has been a requirement for both parents to be citizens.
3 - What argument do you make for a requirement for two parents ?”
Wrong. Wrong. and, Wrong. Read the source in one of the above posts. Bet you won’t.
The "source" cited doesn't back up your claim that both parents need to be citizens. Maybe YOU should read it again? Or find a real source to back up your claim? It shouldn't be that hard. You said it's been posted everywhere, right?
“Wrong. Wrong. and, Wrong. Read the source in one of the above posts. Bet you won’t.”
The Constitution is open for all to read and full of simple, if sometimes arcane, language. I don’t need a source to tell me whether or not the Constitution defines “natural born”. I know it doesn’t. If everyone knew what it meant way back when, fine. That doesn’t change the fact that it isn’t defined in the document itself.