[spyone]

But didn’t the state just say last week that the physical records were destroyed?

[pissant]

According to CNN they did. Of course either CNN or the person who told them that was pulling out of their butt.

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

But didn’t the state just say last week that the physical records were destroyed?
_______________________________________________

Well, to the libtards....that was sooooooooooo ‘yesterday’. They’re on to the next ‘spin’. ‘Can’t see the forest for the trees, you know’. ;-)

[Shermy]

“But didn’t the state just say last week that the physical records were destroyed?”

Absolutely not.

The CNN chief said his researchers determined the paper documents were “discarded” which was misinterpreted by many, as CNN intended, to mean “destroyed.”

[real_patriotic_american]

Yes, they don’t seem to reliable.

This whole story sounds phoney. Let’s see Obama’s original long form birth certificate. PROOF!!

You wrote-
“But didn’t the state just say last week that the physical records were destroyed?”

[OneWingedShark]

Is that enough doubt to audit/probe HI offices for corruption/graft/incompetence?

[El Gato]

But didn’t the state just say last week that the physical records were destroyed?

Yes they did, and the Good Doctor says they are "on file", whereas the previous statement said, "on record". On file indicates a physical document.

[RinaseaofDs]

Nope, the WH did. The state contradicted that and re-emphasized that they destroyed nothing.

If they had the BC that supported their man, they’d have shown it, and they don’t.

Too bad about Coulter. She’s been a stickler for fact, and there’s a lack of them here.