She certainly lives up to her name.
Susan Dumass?
Really?
Of course our elitist RINO buttwipes want to put a stake in it. THEY could have demanded Obama prove his eligibility and refused to do so. Ergo, the are aiding and abetting this treasonous fraud.
When he ultimately goes down I want them to go down with him!
Obama could do it in five minutes if he wanted to. All he has to do is release his long form birth certificate, and it all goes away instantly.
How hard is that?
I wouldn’t give that site a hit. It’s one thing to object to the ‘birther’ movement but another to write total drivel (poorly).
Her name can’t really be Susan Dumass??? It’s just way too perfect!
If the birthers are nuts, then why is ozero spending a huge pile of cash to keep ALL his records sealed? Sounds like the birthers are getting to the ozero types. Keep it up.
Yet another in a l o n g string of left wing idiots trying to run the Republican party!
Wow! The louder they whine.......
There are far greater threats that the Obama presidency is doing to America than to worry about this. They are about to create a welfare monstrosity out of health care that cannot be unwound, they are taking over the major industries and defining national levels of compensation, they have begun a cannibalistic class war promising the rich will pay for all things and promising no tax accountability for 50% of the country, they have put a psycho “national sterilizer” in as the science CZAR, they are installing a wise latina racist supremacist as a Justice of the Supreme Court that blatantly and proudly discriminates against white males, they are passing a trillion dollar cap and trade debacle that will makes slaves of us, they are promoting the idea that we should pay for China and India’s CO2 emissions, they are apologizing for imagined US crimes like global warming, they have taken bribe money from convicted felons like Tony Reszko, they want our tax dollars to cover people’s elective contraceptive abortions and the list goes on and on.
There are far worse things that must be attacked because they will be impossible to undo.
Bring on the BC, all college records, etc. BeeO must prove to TRUE natural born Americans you are eligible to serve as President otherwise resign or the US Marshals need to arrest you punk.
A small group continued pursuing the Clinton's Whitewater dealings for years and I can't see how that hurt the party. The party followed Clinton with six of its strongest years ever.
As long as Obama refuses to release his original certificate (which two state officials profess they do have), this won't die. And the more Obama discredits himself as he's done this week, the more who will wonder about his motives in the BC matter.
A small group continuing with this story won't hurt the part. No need for such hysterics.
It’s pronounced Du Mas.
Sure it is.
I hope there are six dozen more of these types of controversies that spring up around Zero.
Or, he could just show the BC. Nah, why do something that simple when you can throw an army of lawyers out there instead?
LOLLLLLLROFLMAOLLLLLLOLOOL!!!!!
I say bring it on, the more press = more awareness and interest of the general public. Keep in mind no matter what develops they'll spin it for Obama and against the rest of the country. . .
For those who think Snopes is "the last word"- A message not paid for by George Soros/DNC:
But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com. Only recently did Wikipedia get to the bottom of it - kinda makes you wonder what they were hiding. Well, finally we know. It is run by a husband and wife team - that*s right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers.. It*s just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby. David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago - and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research. After a few years it gained popularity believing it to be unbiased and neutral, but over the past couple of years people started asking questions who was behind it and did they have a selfish motivation? The reason for the questions - or skepticisms - is a result of snopes.com claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issues, when in fact, they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the *true* bottom of various issues. When I saw that Snopes had falsely claimed that Obama*s Birth Certificate had been properly validated, I realized something was wrong with either their research and/or their credibility. It seems something is seriously wrong with both. Then a few months ago, when my State Farm agent Bud Gregg in Mandeville hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the internet, supposedly the Mikkelson*s claim to have researched this issue before posting their findings on snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort ever took place. I personally contacted David Mikkelson (and he replied back to me) thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this, and I gave him Bud Gregg*s contact phone numbers. Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec*s at State Farm in Illinois who would have been willing to speak with him about it. He never called Bud. In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg no one from snopes.com ever contacted anyone with State Farm. Yet snopes.com issued a statement as the *final factual word* on the issue as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things. Not! Then it has been learned the Mikkelson*s are very Democrat and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose agenda to discredit anything that appears to be conservative. There has been much criticism lately over the internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson*s liberalism revealing itself in their website findings. Gee, what a shock! So, I say this now to everyone who goes to www.snopes.com to get what they think to be the bottom line facts: Proceed with caution. Take what it says at face value and nothing more. Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to and read the sources for yourself. Plus, you can always google a subject and do the research yourself. It now seems apparent that*s all the Mikkelson*s do. After all, I can personally vouch from my own experience for their *not* fully looking into things |
Susan J. Demas writes:
If you want to read mind-numbing, inscrutable analysis of everything from Britney Spears baby drama to Barack Obamas choice in underwear, then the blogosphere is for you.
******
“The Republican Party has always relished looking backward.”
“They’ve sought to rocket the Wayback Machine to 1962 or even 1929, bizarrely longing for the glory days of Herbert Hoover and Jim Crow.”
“It started with the proposed $14 billion bridge loan for Chrysler and General Motors.”
“There’s a reason why few Republicans have attempted to rehabilitate the reputation of the stocky free-market stalwart decades later.”
******
December 13, 2008
A Death Sentence for Detroit
By Susan Demas
Polls show most Americans don’t want Uncle Sam to help the Big Three and I couldn’t care less.
They’re wrong, plain and simple, but it’s not entirely their fault. The amount of misinformation floating out there on ye olde information superhighway and from TV anchors who should know better is staggering.
Unfortunately, this won’t stop the Big Three bashing because it’s too much fun. What we have is an axis of ignorance of far-out environmentalists and free-market Republicans.
Letting the Big Three die isn’t just cutting off our nose to spite our face. It would be a decapitation.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/12/a_death_sentence_for_detroit.html