Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Yep. The left is left relying on Jon Stewworm to save Obama. LOL
1 posted on 07/24/2009 8:11:57 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: pissant
Susan Dumass

She certainly lives up to her name.

2 posted on 07/24/2009 8:14:25 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century. I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Susan Dumass?

Really?


4 posted on 07/24/2009 8:16:41 PM PDT by TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Of course our elitist RINO buttwipes want to put a stake in it. THEY could have demanded Obama prove his eligibility and refused to do so. Ergo, the are aiding and abetting this treasonous fraud.

When he ultimately goes down I want them to go down with him!


6 posted on 07/24/2009 8:20:09 PM PDT by conservativegramma (Palin has my vote: whoever the media hates I love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Obama could do it in five minutes if he wanted to. All he has to do is release his long form birth certificate, and it all goes away instantly.

How hard is that?


7 posted on 07/24/2009 8:20:18 PM PDT by Ronin (It will be helpful if Geithner can show us some arithmetic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

I wouldn’t give that site a hit. It’s one thing to object to the ‘birther’ movement but another to write total drivel (poorly).


8 posted on 07/24/2009 8:20:27 PM PDT by EDINVA (A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul -- G. B. Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Her name can’t really be Susan Dumass??? It’s just way too perfect!


10 posted on 07/24/2009 8:22:09 PM PDT by sissyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

If the birthers are nuts, then why is ozero spending a huge pile of cash to keep ALL his records sealed? Sounds like the birthers are getting to the ozero types. Keep it up.


12 posted on 07/24/2009 8:25:08 PM PDT by Texas resident ( Boys and Girls, it's us against them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Yet another in a l o n g string of left wing idiots trying to run the Republican party!


13 posted on 07/24/2009 8:27:32 PM PDT by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
They protest too much, me thinks. The more that they protest against the “birthers,” the more that I'm inclined to believe that they are afraid the stories might be true. Be careful when libs act like they want to help the GOP. Are they really concerned that the GOP might lose support?
14 posted on 07/24/2009 8:27:38 PM PDT by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Wow! The louder they whine.......


15 posted on 07/24/2009 8:27:45 PM PDT by FrdmLvr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

There are far greater threats that the Obama presidency is doing to America than to worry about this. They are about to create a welfare monstrosity out of health care that cannot be unwound, they are taking over the major industries and defining national levels of compensation, they have begun a cannibalistic class war promising the rich will pay for all things and promising no tax accountability for 50% of the country, they have put a psycho “national sterilizer” in as the science CZAR, they are installing a wise latina racist supremacist as a Justice of the Supreme Court that blatantly and proudly discriminates against white males, they are passing a trillion dollar cap and trade debacle that will makes slaves of us, they are promoting the idea that we should pay for China and India’s CO2 emissions, they are apologizing for imagined US crimes like global warming, they have taken bribe money from convicted felons like Tony Reszko, they want our tax dollars to cover people’s elective contraceptive abortions and the list goes on and on.

There are far worse things that must be attacked because they will be impossible to undo.


19 posted on 07/24/2009 8:37:23 PM PDT by Titus-Maximus (Light from Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Bring on the BC, all college records, etc. BeeO must prove to TRUE natural born Americans you are eligible to serve as President otherwise resign or the US Marshals need to arrest you punk.


27 posted on 07/24/2009 8:45:55 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
These people are nuts.

A small group continued pursuing the Clinton's Whitewater dealings for years and I can't see how that hurt the party. The party followed Clinton with six of its strongest years ever.

As long as Obama refuses to release his original certificate (which two state officials profess they do have), this won't die. And the more Obama discredits himself as he's done this week, the more who will wonder about his motives in the BC matter.

A small group continuing with this story won't hurt the part. No need for such hysterics.

29 posted on 07/24/2009 8:48:50 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

It’s pronounced Du Mas.

Sure it is.


30 posted on 07/24/2009 8:49:09 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Yeppir, I remember how the Dims tried to stop the 9/11 conspiracy people, the people who claimed that Bush sabotaged the dams after Katrina, the people who claimed he stole the 2000 election, and how even now, they're trying to stop the endless stream of ethics complaints against Sarah Palin.

I hope there are six dozen more of these types of controversies that spring up around Zero.

31 posted on 07/24/2009 8:54:23 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

Or, he could just show the BC. Nah, why do something that simple when you can throw an army of lawyers out there instead?


35 posted on 07/24/2009 9:04:06 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
Wikipedia and Jon Stewart the definitive voice's of authority for the left....

LOLLLLLLROFLMAOLLLLLLOLOOL!!!!!

37 posted on 07/24/2009 9:11:05 PM PDT by tophat9000 (Obama plans to fix America like he fixed his dog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
The only reason the left goes into Alinsky attack mode is if they perceive a credible threat and want to destroy someone or an idea, a la Palin or the Birthers.

I say bring it on, the more press = more awareness and interest of the general public. Keep in mind no matter what develops they'll spin it for Obama and against the rest of the country. . .

42 posted on 07/24/2009 9:24:10 PM PDT by Art in Idaho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: potlatch

For those who think Snopes is "the last word"

- A message not paid for by George Soros/DNC:

THIS MAY SURPRISE YOU



For the past few years www.snopes.com has positioned itself, or others have labeled it as the *tell-all, final word* on any comment, claim and e-mail.

But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com. Only recently did Wikipedia get to the bottom of it - kinda makes you wonder what they were hiding. Well, finally we know. It is run by a husband and wife team - that*s right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers.. It*s just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby.

David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago - and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research. After a few years it gained popularity believing it to be unbiased and neutral, but over the past couple of years people started asking questions who was behind it and did they have a selfish motivation? The reason for the questions - or skepticisms - is a result of snopes.com claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issues, when in fact, they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the *true* bottom of various issues.

When I saw that Snopes had falsely claimed that Obama*s Birth Certificate had been properly validated, I realized something was wrong with either their research and/or their credibility. It seems something is seriously wrong with both.

Then a few months ago, when my State Farm agent Bud Gregg in Mandeville hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the internet, supposedly the Mikkelson*s claim to have researched this issue before posting their findings on snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort ever took place.

I personally contacted David Mikkelson (and he replied back to me) thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this, and I gave him Bud Gregg*s contact phone numbers. Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec*s at State Farm in Illinois who would have been willing to speak with him about it. He never called Bud. In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg no one from snopes.com ever contacted anyone with State Farm. Yet snopes.com issued a statement as the *final factual word* on the issue as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things. Not!

Then it has been learned the Mikkelson*s are very Democrat and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose agenda to discredit anything that appears to be conservative. There has been much criticism lately over the internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson*s liberalism revealing itself in their website findings. Gee, what a shock!

So, I say this now to everyone who goes to www.snopes.com to get what they think to be the bottom line facts: Proceed with caution. Take what it says at face value and nothing more. Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to and read the sources for yourself. Plus, you can always google a subject and do the research yourself. It now seems apparent that*s all the Mikkelson*s do. After all, I can personally vouch from my own experience for their *not* fully looking into things



snopes.png



43 posted on 07/24/2009 9:37:42 PM PDT by devolve (- - Take your stinking czars off me you damned skinny Kenyan! - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant

http://tinyurl.com/mufbe9

Susan J. Demas writes:

If you want to read mind-numbing, inscrutable “analysis” of everything from Britney Spears’ baby drama to Barack Obama’s choice in underwear, then the blogosphere is for you.

******

“The Republican Party has always relished looking backward.”

“They’ve sought to rocket the Wayback Machine to 1962 or even 1929, bizarrely longing for the glory days of Herbert Hoover and Jim Crow.”

“It started with the proposed $14 billion bridge loan for Chrysler and General Motors.”

“There’s a reason why few Republicans have attempted to rehabilitate the reputation of the stocky free-market stalwart decades later.”

******

December 13, 2008
A Death Sentence for Detroit
By Susan Demas

Polls show most Americans don’t want Uncle Sam to help the Big Three and I couldn’t care less.

They’re wrong, plain and simple, but it’s not entirely their fault. The amount of misinformation floating out there on ye olde information superhighway and from TV anchors who should know better is staggering.

Unfortunately, this won’t stop the Big Three bashing because it’s too much fun. What we have is an axis of ignorance of far-out environmentalists and free-market Republicans.

Letting the Big Three die isn’t just cutting off our nose to spite our face. It would be a decapitation.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/12/a_death_sentence_for_detroit.html


44 posted on 07/24/2009 9:38:23 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson