Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kellynla

> we all know that...the POINT is that states and the FEC
> are NOT requiring proof!

Then they are in violation of the Law and the management needs to be arrested and brought to trial.

Meanwhile, the President must be compelled to show that he meets the minimum Constitutional requirements, age and nation of birth. If he can’t or won’t, he can’t serve.

Of course, getting the touchy-feely jerks running the government to actually obey the Law is an exercise in futility.

In that case, we are no longer a Nation of Laws, we are no longer a Republic, but rather a mob-rule Democracy. The Constitution is rendered de facto null and void, and the Laws are whatever the polls say they are, subject to change with the vicissitudes of the culture, if that’s what you can call it.


49 posted on 07/15/2009 5:41:10 PM PDT by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Westbrook

“Then they are in violation of the Law?”

what “law?”

point to a federal law that requires states to vet candidates?

waiting...LOL

kinda like “check? I thought you were checking.”


56 posted on 07/15/2009 5:46:00 PM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Westbrook

Baloney!

Yes, there is a Constitutional question involved, but it is entirely possible to violate that document without committing a crime.

Crimes are defined by LEGISLATION, and we just don’t have any, right now, in this matter.


114 posted on 07/15/2009 6:24:16 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson