Don’t know...I was confused...thought it was the case we stayed up for all hours waiting for the LA times article. That is CA ...Judge ruling on merits not procedure.
Actually the CA one was ruling on procedure. Not merits.
“”thought it was the case we stayed up for all hours waiting for the LA times article. That is CA ...Judge ruling on merits not procedure.””
What did happen in the court in Santa Ana yesterday? Haven’t seen any reports yet.. Everyone was placing a lot of confidence in the judge (Carter?), a Bush appointee.
Other way around. The judge found that the defendant had never been properly served within the required 120 days and he granted Taitz an extension so she could do so. That's within his powers to do. While Obama is the defendant, nobody expects the President to be served in person and the local U.S. attorney is authorized to be served on behalf of the U.S. Apparently Taitz didn't realize that. The judge ordered both Taitz and the representative from the U.S. Attorney's Office to consult and go together to properly serve the U.S. attorney. So now the defense has another 60 days to respond, at which time they will no doubt file another motion to dismiss. At that time the judge will either grant the motion to dismiss or let it move forward.