To: armymarinedad
"Third, I cannot support him disobeying orders." Servicemembers are obligated to disobey unlawful orders. The only point at issue is the legitimacy of the order.
132 posted on
07/14/2009 8:27:03 AM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Joe 6-pack
Servicemembers are obligated to disobey unlawful orders. The only point at issue is the legitimacy of the order. Obama didn't issue the order to this officer, it came from his superior officer in his chain of command. What makes that person's order unlawful?
To: Joe 6-pack
Servicemembers are obligated to disobey unlawful orders.Which brings us to the crux of this whole debate. The question of the orders lawfulness rests in Obama's legitimacy to hold the office. At this time Obama is the legitimate President. Should someone present evidence to the contrary then Maj Cook would be right in his actions.
139 posted on
07/14/2009 8:56:45 AM PDT by
armymarinedad
(Support, v., To take the side of; to uphold or help.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson