Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BeerLover NYC
"A pregnant female active duty servicewoman is far more detrimental to the military than two homosexuals having a fling." You're posing a faulty dilemma...

BTW, how would you propose to preserve some bit of privacy for military members living in communal conditions? Please reconcile with current polices segregating male and female quarters, showers, etc. Also, note the article provides no information concerning maintenance of discipline. Either the example countries noted don't have particularly "expeditionary" armed forces (i.e. they don't deploy and live in tents/barracks/ships to the extent we do), they accept exposing their soldiers to very uncomfortable or worse conditions or they have some pretty strict polices to keep order.

I'd bet a pile of money that there have been serious but unpublicized problems. The only question is to what extent. Imagine how much worse the heterosexual discipline troubles you allude to would be without the ability to readily segregate men and women.

The current "don't ask/don't tell" policy works. It provides a ceiling to limit disruptive behavior while allowing homosexuals to serve.

31 posted on 07/13/2009 1:16:01 PM PDT by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Red Dog #1

The whole privacy issue is a big one. You’re right insofar as other countries not being involved in combat situations to the extent that we are. The idea of women in certain situations—on submarines for example, is disconcerting if the issue is privacy.


35 posted on 07/13/2009 2:29:21 PM PDT by BeerLover NYC (ABC, baby now, 123, face surgery, 123, freaky dee, ABC, glad it's you not me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson