He slammed FR right in the intro. Why did kristinn even bother to appear? It was just an attempt to make FR look bad. I think FR should try and avoid these set-up jobs in the future. Now the damage is done. They got their FR slam in there, probably to people who have never even heard of FR. Was it worth it to appear? I don’t think so.
Of course it was worth it. He pointed out that the article was incorrect.
Yes, it was an attempt to slam FR, but I think it was well worth it.
Had I no prior knowledge of FR and judged FR solely based on this short appearance by Kristinn holding his own against MSNBC I would quickly say that FR was composed of people with a good dose of common sense and an ability to hold their own against Leftist garbage.
Again, thanks, Kristinn, for heading into the lair of the Leftist and coming out smelling like a rose.
My cable did not carry it...but from what I saw on comments on Freep...YOU GOT THE JOB DONE KRISTINN!!
We can never have “fairness” on the mSM, but Kristinn defended Freep, and got FREE MSMS AIRTIME FOR FREEPER!
Its what I said earlier..even in worst case sceanrio to have an articulate, polite strong spokesman on there and get the Freep site named will bring independents to the site, just to see what its about!
Well. If it were anything other than MSNBC we might get some new visitors. Since it is, though, net effect is probably zero.
Even bad publicity is good publicity. Some viewers will come and take a look for themselves and realize that the press is lying.
“He slammed FR right in the intro. Why did kristinn even bother to appear? It was just an attempt to make FR look bad. I think FR should try and avoid these set-up jobs in the future. Now the damage is done. They got their FR slam in there, probably to people who have never even heard of FR. Was it worth it to appear? I don’t think so.”
++++++++++++++++
It’s a legit question. I think it’s always good to engage. Whichever conservative politicians succeed in the future - Reagan style - will also have to engage the loony left. However, I wish it were CNN, which is watched slightly more broadly than the RATS channel PMSNBC.
Do you think it would have been worth it on CNN? CNN would have probably also had to ‘try’ to look objective - whereas these bozos and Parry don’t even have to try.