You, and Chris, are the only ones who seem to take his cute(sic) little acronym as anything but face value with crude statements about “negros” and the statement “blame Republicans”. Even his so called explanation that he was talking about Katrina damns him as he is saying to take all the suffering caused by Democrats (see the mayor and governor) and blame the Republicans for it. Even if you take his excuse at face value, he, as a member of the media, is admitting into trying to create the storyline.
There ya go...
“You, and Chris, are the only ones who seem to take his cute(sic) little acronym as anything but face value with crude statements about “negros” and the statement “blame Republicans”. Even his so called explanation that he was talking about Katrina damns him as he is saying to take all the suffering caused by Democrats (see the mayor and governor) and blame the Republicans for it. Even if you take his excuse at face value, he, as a member of the media, is admitting into trying to create the storyline.”
++++++++++++++
Say what? There’s at least 10 of us basically asking this question mnehring - so don’t try to put me over in Chris Parry’s camp. Not gunna happen friend.
You’re not even getting the issue. joinedafterattack said that that mnumonic meant this:
“Chris Parry actually advocated attacking “negros” and blaming the republicans for it.”
I’m just asking how that is connected and you’re coming up with ‘you and Chris are the only ones’ business.
Why don’t you just answer the question? It doesn’t make sense. I think specific, bolded accusations that we’re making should make sense.
There’s plenty about this that does make sense. So let’s focus on that! Your last sentence is starting to make more sense along these lines.
Actually, no, there are others. Me, for one. I just do not make the connection and still take the juvenile posturing at face value only.