Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

Better use of this of this $1M missle.....

Use it to kill a $500M plus warship and take out forward agressor projection than destoying a small factory (unless of course it produces baby formula) that is worth a couple of million.


2 posted on 07/12/2009 7:44:12 AM PDT by nevergore ("It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nevergore

Given the Tomahawk’s relatively slow speed, would it not be vulnerable to CIWsystems on the sea where it’s ability to fly the nape of the geography is lost?


4 posted on 07/12/2009 7:53:41 AM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

This is interesting because back in the days there was an anti-ship variant known as TASM. It was removed from the fleet in the mid-90s. It was *not* the same missile as the land-attack version. I can’t speak for the new one, but the old versions were not interchangeable; they were either anti-ship or land-attack variants.

A Tomahawk doesn’t cost a million dollars, has a greater range and is faster than a Predator. Each Predator requires a trained operator; a few people can launch dozens of Tomahawks. Tomahawks are launched from a ship’s Vertical Launching System or from a submarine, which you can’t do with a Predator. It’s radar cross-section is pretty small, and it would most likely be a sea-skimmer, so while anti-missile systems would be a threat, probably not much of one.


7 posted on 07/12/2009 8:19:26 AM PDT by Lunkker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson