Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Light-bulb liars: What's lit up isn't a great idea
The Washington Times ^ | July 11, 2009 | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on 07/11/2009 4:24:31 AM PDT by Scanian

What if in 2025 a husband and wife decide they want to use old-fashioned incandescent bulbs in the sanctuary of their home? Will the light-bulb left defend their right to privacy and freedom of choice?

Don't count on it. Many Americans may not know it yet, but the federal government has already effectively banned the type of light bulb most of us use today.

In 2007, President Bush signed the Energy Independence and Security Act, mandating that household light bulbs use incrementally less electricity starting in 2012 and culminating in 2020, when they must use less than 70 percent of the electricity conventional incandescent bulbs use today.

Compact fluorescent bulbs already meet this standard. The congressional authors of the law understood they were, in essence, phasing out incandescent bulbs.

They did this, they said, to help save the planet from overheating. But the light-bulb left did not weigh -- or care about -- the unintended consequences of their crusade. One such consequence could be an environment disaster in your family room.

You see, fluorescent bulbs contain mercury -- a bad, bad pollutant and health hazard that the Environmental Protection Agency has been sounding alarms about for years.

This put the EPA in a tough spot. On the one hand, it needed to applaud the politically correct use of fluorescent bulbs to save the planet. On the other hand, it needed to warn people that if they break a fluorescent bulb in their home it could poison the dog, the kid and the wall-to-wall rug. So, the EPA published blatantly self-contradictory instructions about what to do if mercury spills at your house.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

1 posted on 07/11/2009 4:24:31 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian

All I can say is dumb, dumb, dumb. And we really have to thank Pres.Bush for this nonsense. Of course Bambi would have intiated it himself if Bush hadn’t done it.


2 posted on 07/11/2009 4:28:04 AM PDT by GnL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GnL

intiated = initiated


3 posted on 07/11/2009 4:28:32 AM PDT by GnL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
Mercury is just one issue. Those of us who have visual perception disorders and those with lupus and other medical conditions that are exacerbated by fluorescent lights are SOL.
4 posted on 07/11/2009 4:30:16 AM PDT by Desdemona (True Christianity requires open hearts and open minds - not blind hatred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

LEDs are the future for lighting.


5 posted on 07/11/2009 4:34:19 AM PDT by TommyDale (Independent - I already left the GOP because they were too liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
stock up now

those stupid expensive florescent are good for sh*t

I had a whole case of them from a home remodeling project i had done- they lasted 2 years.

I have a half case left of some incandescents from 10 years ago

6 posted on 07/11/2009 4:35:15 AM PDT by Mr. K (THIS ADMINISTRATION IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY DAMMIT DAMMIT DAMMIT!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
The 75-watt version cost $3.47 per bulb -- compared to .22 cents for a 75-watt incandescent bulb.

Twenty-two cents for an incandescent 75 watt bulb? My eye.

In two decades land fill will be full of mercury. I just sweep them up and toss them in the trash. I don't care what the EPA says. And, millions of people will not either.A actually like the CFL's. They're a lot better than when they first came out. But, this whole idea of presidents telling us what we can and cannot do in our own homes has to stop.

7 posted on 07/11/2009 4:36:57 AM PDT by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

It’s odd, though, that the enviroscreamers of yesteryear never saw fit to urge John Q. Public to don hazmat suits when the fluorescent lamps of that day (e.g. kitchen ceiling circlines, medicine cabinet and basement workshop straight tubes) broke. A broom and a dustpan, maybe a non-electric floor sweeper, and that was that. These old lamps had a lot more mercury per bulb than today’s compacts.

A worse scandal is that we are exporting our brownness to China. Recent factories are safer (kudos in particular to Osram/Sylvania), but mercury poisonings used to be fairly common at CFL plants in China.


8 posted on 07/11/2009 4:37:38 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Think of the D Party as what it really is: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Twenty-two cents for an incandescent 75 watt bulb? My eye.

Your eye out for bargains, like Wal-Mart. $0.88 a four pack.

9 posted on 07/11/2009 4:40:59 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Think of the D Party as what it really is: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Everyone acts like flourescent light is something new and many complain incessantly. Yet, all schools that I know of use it as well as retail outlets etc, etc....and people never said boo...

Incandescent was "the prettier bulb"...and not much more...

10 posted on 07/11/2009 4:41:04 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

So I stocked up on bulbs last year at Walmart during a sale and have enough to last for 40 years.
WHO is going to know what type light bulb I have under a shade in a light fixture in my home in 2020? Is the Government going to send inspectors around to search peoples homes?
What utter nonsense.......


11 posted on 07/11/2009 4:41:23 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Coming to You From the Front Lines of Occupied America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

” These old lamps had a lot more mercury per bulb than today’s compacts.”

Those old lamps made great lite sabers/swords for bored kids also.


12 posted on 07/11/2009 4:46:22 AM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Twenty-two cents for an incandescent 75 watt bulb? My eye. Your eye out for bargains, like Wal-Mart. $0.88 a four pack.

Yeah, I've seen them. They last about four weeks. Buying cheap means cheap. Quality incandescent last longer but you pay more for them.

13 posted on 07/11/2009 4:46:41 AM PDT by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Personally I like the compact flourescent bulbs but that is my CHOICE. The thing to remember is that if you buy cheap ones you get cheap ones.

Most that I have don’t have the flourescent look and some are now several years old and still going strong.


14 posted on 07/11/2009 4:46:55 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA
Is the Government going to send inspectors around to search peoples homes?

Well according to cap and trade, yes.
15 posted on 07/11/2009 4:48:20 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
I personally prefer CFLs as they have improved in quality and reliability over time. The costs have also come down as well.

But it is stupid to ban incandescents. Outside of personal preferences and, IMO, someone's God-given freedom to pick whatever lightbulb he/she wishes to use, there are many situations in which CFLs are simply impractical. Any time when you need a lot light in a short amount of time (i.e. people with medical problems related to CFLs, motion activated lights, stoplights, etc.) a CFL simply won't do it. Even if the prices of LED lights (which are supposed to address these problems) come down to something reasonable, it just seems so stupid that government thinks we cannot choose our own light bulbs.

16 posted on 07/11/2009 4:49:50 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

The earliest compacts, put out by independent companies rather than by major lamp manufacturers, often suffered from weak and uneven color spectra popularly described as a “strange cast.” You can still see specimens of these early lamps if you walk into any dollar store.


17 posted on 07/11/2009 4:51:41 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Think of the D Party as what it really is: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

About 20 years ago, I purchased some old-style carbon filament bulbs for some historic lighting in my house. The bulbs I installed in a hall fixture are still working 20 years later! As they say about carbon filament bulbs; twice the power, for half the light.


18 posted on 07/11/2009 4:53:01 AM PDT by 6SJ7 (atlasShruggedInd: ON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Yet, all schools that I know of use it as well as retail outlets etc, etc....and people never said boo...

Actually, a good many of us have had to limit our time in such places and have had to alter our work environments in order to be able to function. The light fixture right over my desk at work is dark. Some malls I can't patronize because of the lights. I have a time limit in the grocery store. I can't study or read at the local library. Rehearsals for one choir are particularly painful as I get nauseous after about 45 minutes under fluorescent lights.

It's not so much the public areas, but that the government is now dictating what sort of lighting we can and cannot have in our homes. If the question involved pistols, many people on this forum who think this is a non-issue would be shouting from rooftops.

19 posted on 07/11/2009 4:53:21 AM PDT by Desdemona (True Christianity requires open hearts and open minds - not blind hatred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Depends on where they go. In a porch light controlled by nothing but a dusk to dawn photo eye, they will last for over a year.


20 posted on 07/11/2009 4:53:25 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Think of the D Party as what it really is: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson