Replies

“Those “most people” are just as anonymous as the GOP/ex-McCain flunkies who criticize Palin in the shadows. “

You are paranoid and see a anti Palin conspiracy everywhere by McCain/Romney operatives.

Rasmussen poll says about 40% of Republican voters think Palin has hurt her chances by resigning.

So you are not saying 40% of republicans are McCain/Romney operatives < sarcasm off>

“She wouldn’t have gotten anything done from now until 2010 and by the time the 2012 presidential race got underway, her term would have been characterized as being “scandal-plagued”. “

Since she has successfully fought her ethics charges, then why would she be scandal plagued.

‘Furthermore, her term would have finished in Dec of 2010 and she would have needed several months to get an exploratory committee underway and hire a staff. ‘

She could still set up a exploratory committeein Aug/Sept 2010 after she has announced she would not seek reelection. What is so difficult about it.

“She has given plausible reasons why she is stepping down and we don’t know if she’s really going to run in 2012 or not. “

Her reasons simply are not convincing to a large section of Republican primary voters. While she was the overwhelming favourite to win the nomination before this, after resigning she has lost some of the edge, it is still too early to speculate on her chances at the 2002 election.

“She wouldn’t have gotten anything done from now until 2010 and by the time the 2012 presidential race got underway, her term would have been characterized as being “scandal-plagued”. “

Since she has successfully fought her ethics charges, then why would she be scandal plagued.

Boy was that a dis-engenuous statement.

You, and I, and anyone with half a brain-cell left no that the ethics charges would keep coming and coming and coming further bankrupting the Palins and her staff would be spending just as much time (80% according to her staff) and accomplishing little more than spending more of the State of Alaska's precious little monetary resources.

This alone, the continual barage of the ethics charges would be used by a totally biased media as proof of how "dirty" Governor Palin was.

Really a lackluster post with really no substance as usual.

Point out to us really important matters like where Palin is wrong on the issues, how about something, anything where she has actually failed at Governing Alaska, how about some type of infidelity that affects her character?

Oh wait, you can't!

All you can do is mimic the lame, empty, devoid of any real substance OPINIONS of the Press, the DNC, Ed Rendell, and the supporters of potential primary opponents.

Thanks for your unsupported opinion concerning Sarah.

Oh, and by the way, who are you really supporting for 2012?