Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GregH
“She wouldn’t have gotten anything done from now until 2010 and by the time the 2012 presidential race got underway, her term would have been characterized as being “scandal-plagued”. “

Since she has successfully fought her ethics charges, then why would she be scandal plagued.


Boy was that a dis-engenuous statement.

You, and I, and anyone with half a brain-cell left no that the ethics charges would keep coming and coming and coming further bankrupting the Palins and her staff would be spending just as much time (80% according to her staff) and accomplishing little more than spending more of the State of Alaska's precious little monetary resources.

This alone, the continual barage of the ethics charges would be used by a totally biased media as proof of how "dirty" Governor Palin was.

Really a lackluster post with really no substance as usual.

Point out to us really important matters like where Palin is wrong on the issues, how about something, anything where she has actually failed at Governing Alaska, how about some type of infidelity that affects her character?

Oh wait, you can't!

All you can do is mimic the lame, empty, devoid of any real substance OPINIONS of the Press, the DNC, Ed Rendell, and the supporters of potential primary opponents.

Thanks for your unsupported opinion concerning Sarah.

Oh, and by the way, who are you really supporting for 2012?
40 posted on 07/09/2009 9:02:31 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie

‘keep coming and coming and coming further bankrupting the Palins and her staff would be spending just as much time (80% according to her staff) and accomplishing little more than spending more of the State of Alaska’s precious little monetary resources. ‘

As a article says clearly, Sarah could have used the ethics charges and turned it against here enemies and crush the local Democrats and help the Republican party, she has no problems in raising money to fight the ethics charges, she could have really lifted her profile as a fighter rather than just quitting her job.

Her reasons for resigning are not very sound or convincing.

‘Point out to us really important matters like where Palin is wrong on the issues, how about something, anything where she has actually failed at Governing Alaska, how about some type of infidelity that affects her character? ‘

I have no issues in Palin who is fundamentally sound decent person and with good morals. She is erratic and inexperienced and to run against a goliath like Obama you need discipline. Unlike Reagan, Sarah is inexperienced to run for national office.


59 posted on 07/09/2009 9:17:35 PM PDT by GregH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson