Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If the grassroots TEA Party movement could nominate a candidate for president, who would it be?
July 9, 2009 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 07/09/2009 11:51:22 AM PDT by Jim Robinson

The TEA Party movement is all about smaller, more representative government. We are fed up with our unresponsive, ever expanding and totally out of control BIG government.

We feel our elected officials and politicians of both political parties have failed us and no longer represent our interests or the country we love, and no longer deserve our support. The Democrat party is totally lost to Marxism and the Republican party is not far behind. I've heard thousands of people saying it's time to kick them ALL out!

Rebellion is brewing!

If we the members of the grassroots TEA Party movement could nominate a candidate for president, who would it be?

Well, obviously, it should not be a leading member of either of the two major political parties that have failed us so miserably that we're now on the brink of rebellion. No beltway insiders please. No next in line it's my turn candidates. No try again candidates. No media's choice candidates. No slick-haired, smooth talking, two-faced political hacks. Big government, big spending northeastern moderates need not apply.

Time for a fresh face. Time for someone who walks the walk as well as talks the talk. Someone who actually believes in America, believes in small government, believes in freedom, believes the people can and will fend for themselves and do not need or want a government nanny.

Time for an outsider. Time for an outcast. Someone who is not contaminated with Washington politics as usual. Someone with a record of standing up for individual rights, smaller government, smaller taxes, traditional American values, national pride, national defense. Someone who speaks from the heart and connects with we the people by speaking the truth and by truly representing our individual interests and individual freedoms.

Enough with Marxism! We need someone who will say No to more BIG government programs! Say NO to socialist BIG government health care systems! NO to BIG government takeover of private enterprise! NO to crippling BIG government energy boondoggles! NO to global warming hoaxes! NO to BIG spending, BIG taxes, BIG government!

But YES to American individuality, American freedom, American resourcefulness, American independence and the American can do spirit! And YES to American pride, patriotism and national defense!

And YES to good old American know how!

It's good to be American! It's good to be FREE!

You betcha!

Go Sarah!

Drill baby drill!


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: elections; palin; sarahpalin; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last
To: Jim Robinson
Rebellion is brewing!

Sorry, but the tea parties will not do it. No real power there but just wishful thinking. Keep hearing it's a start. Right! Now if there were recall partitions in States that have RAT senators, then the real rebellion would be started. Can't wait until 2010, damage by then would be catastrophic.

41 posted on 07/09/2009 12:08:22 PM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

If you are on the ticket in the middle of the campaign, and the Presidential candidate takes a position, as the VP candidate, you take that position as well.

An independent Sarah Palin is not a TARP supporter. Just as she refused to receive large portions of the Porkulus bill, but was overridden by the legislature.


42 posted on 07/09/2009 12:09:28 PM PDT by johncocktoasten ("Rumors of her political death have been greatly exaggerated.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Sarah certainly fits the bill. I would also nominate my own Congresscritter Randy Forbes, one of the few real conservatives to have survived up on Capitol Hill.


43 posted on 07/09/2009 12:09:35 PM PDT by tgusa (Gun control: deep breath, sight alignment, squeeze the trigger ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Palin / Petraeus

No prisoners.


44 posted on 07/09/2009 12:12:06 PM PDT by Noumenon (As long as I have a rifle, I STILL have a vote...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Sarah Palin, of course.

Generally, anyone who takes the Constitution for what it is: a list of limited granted powers, beyond which no allowance is given.


45 posted on 07/09/2009 12:12:19 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (John Galt was exiled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Palin is the best we have for the time being.

I just tend to be leery of the whole “personality cult” thing, whichever side it may be on.


46 posted on 07/09/2009 12:12:49 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

I like your style.


47 posted on 07/09/2009 12:13:29 PM PDT by Noumenon (As long as I have a rifle, I STILL have a vote...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
re: Sarah Palin, Jim DeMint, Jeff Sessions, Michelle Bachman, Haley Barbour all come to mind.

I would like to see these people, and several more, put on a committee of sorts to travel around for the next two years taking the conservative cause to the people in every state, at every level. Mix and match them in their appearances and have them go into areas with all kinds of demographics. Let's see how people react to them. At some point one or two of them will begin to stand out.

48 posted on 07/09/2009 12:13:32 PM PDT by jwparkerjr (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Palin/Robinson?


49 posted on 07/09/2009 12:13:37 PM PDT by bgill (The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Go Sarah!

Glad to see you are an impartial observer here. She has not even said she is running. My personal choice for a ticket would be Quayle/Palin, but that's just me.

50 posted on 07/09/2009 12:13:40 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Okay. I agree...but, didn't we try this with Perot? All that got us was the clintons.

How can we do this in a winning way? In a way that doesn't end up with an Obama second term? We would need to have candidates for all national offices.

I think people here are going to have to do something they do not want to do: run for office. It is the people who don't want to be politicians, that we really need in those offices. We need people in who think of serving time in public office as a duty to the country we love-—not a selfserving step to fame and fortune. We need people who are regular citizens, who know the true struggles of their neighbors; who have run businesses, who have run families; who have been at the kitchen table trying to balance their budget; instead of lawyers who have spent all their time figuring out how to use the public to finance their education and social lifestyle.

Sorry to disagree with you, but I don't see that person as Sarah Palin. I nominate Jim Robinson!

51 posted on 07/09/2009 12:14:30 PM PDT by tuckrdout (~ 'Daily example is the most subtle of poisons.' ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Palin/Bachman


52 posted on 07/09/2009 12:16:12 PM PDT by RebelTXRose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I think Sarah w/ John Bolton would be the one..


53 posted on 07/09/2009 12:16:13 PM PDT by BobbyinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I knew when I was barely into your post, which person fit all of those preferences and filled the needed criteria!

BOY! DO I AGREE!

The naysayers about her resignation ignore the fact that she did fulfil all of her campaign promises to the people of Alaska or got them so underway that they are going forth as she promised ... her place now, is to let all of US get to support her on our UNITED turf.

Go Sarah Go!

We need and want you at the top!

No one else has the fortitude to turn back this socialist tide and God will be on our side with Sarah!
54 posted on 07/09/2009 12:16:34 PM PDT by AKA Elena (This morning, my stockbroker told me I should only be buying . . . "Canned Goods and Ammunition"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

The left has proven that it is playing for blood.

I want a fighter. An unapologetic fighter. One who knows their stuff.

1. Coulter
2. Cheney
3. Bachman
4. Palin
(All women? Backbone is found in both genders. Some good men:)
5. Coburn
6. Hunter
7. DeMint
8. Inhofe


55 posted on 07/09/2009 12:16:51 PM PDT by kidd (Obama: The triumph of hope over evidence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Palin.


56 posted on 07/09/2009 12:17:31 PM PDT by Sir Gawain ("Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect" - Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobbyinCT

I forgot Bolton.


57 posted on 07/09/2009 12:17:47 PM PDT by kidd (Obama: The triumph of hope over evidence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

I see the same slow brewing going on just like it was in 1993, the results would be famous year of backlash, 1994.


58 posted on 07/09/2009 12:17:47 PM PDT by Biggirl ("Live Long And Prosper!"-Mr. Spock:)=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Seeing how it was the liberty movement that started the tea parties, I go with Peter Schiff


59 posted on 07/09/2009 12:17:55 PM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

My tagline speaks for itself!


60 posted on 07/09/2009 12:18:15 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson