Do you then have any conception or idea that will keep my little scenario from playing out as stated? Or any scenario at all that could actually work?
Every would-be world ruler since Genghis Khan has been ruthlessly evil — murdering and enslaving millions. Why would anyone imagine that the next one would be different?
Do you think he will play nice of the Pope asks him nicely?
DG
I assume you aren’t expecting any logical, factual, reasonable or straight answers from the
. . . White Hanky Brigade.
You wrote:
“Ok. So you refuse to post anything in concrete terms, and suggest that someone else SHOULD. So, someone else does just that.”
Incorrect. I posted in concrete terms. I always do. What I won’t do is post hypotheticals. That is exactly what everyone is comnplaining about. It doesn’t surprise me that you would exactly state the opposite of the reality that is happening here.
“Do you then have any conception or idea that will keep my little scenario from playing out as stated?”
It doesn’t matter if I do. Your scenario is your scenario. I am not osting here about your scenario. I post here to correct anti-Catholic errors about the faith not dark visions about secular one world governments from anti-Catholics. What you believe in that regard is completely unimportant to me.
“Or any scenario at all that could actually work?”
Again, scenarios of the kind you posted do not interest me.
“Every would-be world ruler since Genghis Khan has been ruthlessly evil — murdering and enslaving millions. Why would anyone imagine that the next one would be different?”
Again, your scenarios do not interest me. Also, you could at leats pick somethig relevant. Ghengis Khan died in the 1220s or so. He started out as a onqueror. That’s not exactly an elected or even appointed office.
“Do you think he will play nice of the Pope asks him nicely?”
Do you think that the pope is hoping for a Ghengis Khan? Could you at least try to be rational?