You wrote:
“Vlad, so you insist that the only way to understand the Pope is to see the stuff in post #143 (straight from the Vatican website) through a filter of “subsidiary”.
Okay, then please give the world an example of how such a thing might be accomplished, with this superauthority having enforcement powers for everything from “world peace” to economic control.”
No. No one is able to give an accurate example of a principle workng within something that doesn’t yet exist. I make no conjectures either.
“If you can’t come up with an example, and the freaking Pope can’t either, then he should shut the Hell up about suggesting this is the way to go when he’s as freaking blind as you are.”
Wow, look at how spastic you’re getting. Poor baby Protestant can’t handle adult conversation? Listen, I don’t mind the fact that you’re losing control like a child, but I don’t see how this helps your case. Are you crying? Do you need a diaper change? And this is exactly the problem. We’re adults...but we’re arguing with people who act like children, anti-Catholic children.
While you are constantly whining about “anti-Catholics”, you are also constantly trashing and insulting Protestants. You need to recognize your own prejudice and hatred toward Protestants and stop ignoring the “board in your own eye”.
Then we could have an “adult conversation”.
We need to get over this intra Christian warfare going on because 1) It’s not “Christian”, 2) We have the same enemies which, in this country, it’s the Secular Left/Marxists, Militant Homos and Atheists. Internationally, it’s Islam and Communism which isn’t dead by a longshot.
All of these groups hate us with a passion. Many Catholics and Protestants have been working together to combat these foes for a long time. For our Lord’s sake as well as our own, it’s time we all got with the program.
I make no conjectures either.
= = = =
I thought the Vatican, Roman Catholocism
had been able to wrap it’s mind around the hypothetical centuries ago.
Oh, right . . . that would get into a logical defense of the assertions . . . admittedly a MOST difficult challenge.
The above is a much wiser escape hatch, no doubt.