Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blackacre

There is very good evidence of a mesopotamian flood, which was the entire “known world” of the time, and almost certainly contained if not all of mankind, an overwhelming percentage of it.

The term “world” was used repeatedly in Genesis to mean this area (e.g., refering to Sargon (or variations of his name) as “king of the world” when we know there were other contemporaneous kingdoms in China).


77 posted on 07/06/2009 12:16:45 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Jewbacca

A lot of cultures arose around rivers, so it’s not surprising that there are a lot of flood myths.

And the creation of the Black Sea probably played a part.

But proponents of the Biblical flood seem to be talking about a flood that covered the entire world as we know it today.


78 posted on 07/06/2009 12:19:24 PM PDT by Blackacre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: Jewbacca
There is very good evidence of a mesopotamian flood, which was the entire “known world” of the time, and almost certainly contained if not all of mankind, an overwhelming percentage of it.

Hey cool. I was hoping somebody would jump on the discussion who held this viewpoint. I'd like to get some clarity as to why you believe as you do regarding the flood. Are you interested in a discussion along these lines?

117 posted on 07/09/2009 7:26:23 AM PDT by 1forall (America - my home, my land, my country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson