Posted on 07/06/2009 7:22:56 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[C]omparisons do a disservice to Reagan, who not only served two full terms as governor of California, but also spent decades studying the issues and immersing himself in conservative philosophy. His writings and radio commentaries make this abundantly clear. He proved people wrong because they objectively were wrong. This does not mean that whenever the media writes off or attacks a conservative politician that he or she is the next Reagan
****
to win and govern effectively you have to do more than "galvanize the party base" and "convince conservatives" -- you also have to convince independents and even some Democrats, as Reagan did [but] instead of going back to Alaska to gain more governing experience as many advised, Palin resigned after just two and a half years on the job. And theres nothing to indicate that she has the slightest interest in boning up on policy. Honestly, whats her incentive to study policy and do the boring task of governing? No matter what she does, her army of apologists will make excuses for her and lash out at those who dare to criticize her by accusing them of being liberal elitists who are threatened by her sheer awesomeness....
[N]one of this really matters if Palin intends to leave elective politics and become some sort of television or radio personality. My comments are only meant as a response to those who are still seriously suggesting her as a potential presidential candidate. Last October, an ABC/Washington Post poll found that only 35 percent of Americans thought Palin was qualified enough to be president, yet now her boosters expect us to believe that an additional nine months in office is all she needed to assauge Americans' concerns, allowing her to resign and prepare for a presidential run.
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
Why Duncan Hunter didn't gain more traction in last years primary, is a profound mystery to me. He's articulate. He's got a great resume and has solid policy positions. And, he was passionate in what he believed.
I don't know if he just didn't generate the campaign funds to get his message out. But, then, you have to ask yourself why wasn't he able to raise more cash, if that was the case. If he couldn't win the nomination, he probably couldn't have beaten Obama, but at least he would have set a stark contrast to the Democrat positions which people could look back on (with remorse)when we enter Great Depression II, shortly.
When you can't defend yourself or your position, apparently you resort to political attacks, heh Mr. Alinsky?
Mr. Klein's piece is spot on. Palin sycophants, when faced with solid criticism, resort to name calling and scapegoating. Very childish indeed.
Incidentally, I believe the word you're searching for is naïveté.
Please enlighten us - I ask because Reagan described himself as a populist - But I am sure that the sagacious Lady Lawyer can dispel any confusion about this.
Fact is, when someone resigns from office, that is called, quitting. Look it up.
>>>>>>I know, I know, she should have stayed, and then lied to the people of Alaska while running for re-election.
No. Palin should have finished out her first term, ending Dec.2010 and then run for the GOP nomination. As of right now, no one knows what Palin is doing. But I wouldn't bet the farm on her running in 2012.
Unfortunately, it's the voters of all political persuasions & ideological inclinations who have stars in their eyes, and they're looking for charisma in their leaders. Like it or not, Obama's got it (that's why he didn't need name recognition) & Duncan just doesn't seem to, unfortunately.
Listen, I don't like facing up to the fact anymore than you do that the American electorate is as susceptible to cults of personality as the citizens of any Latin American banana republic. But we obviously are, & there's no getting around that immutable reality. It's not fair, but hey, like our Dads always told us, life isn't fair. Ya gotta play the hand you're dealt.
You’ve been here a week nubie and all of your posts are nothing but hate spewing against Palin....
You could very well be a Olbergruppenfuhrer, Obamite, or even a hissy little Establishment RINO for all we know.
The best trolls build up some postings before they prematurely rant about.
She will...
Hit the stumps in 2010 campaigning for others
Hit the speaking circuit
Fine tune her policy message(s) during that time
Build a large war chest during that time
Run in 2012
“Fact is, when someone resigns from office, that is called, quitting. Look it up.”
She’s bigger than Alaska now.
Get used to it.
That’s right; that’s exactly what R.Reagan would say himself!
“Still, the GOP establishment and McCain aren’t solely responsible. Our nutty primary system, the MSM and a bunch of moronic voters all did their share.”
No question about that!
Nixon was politically dead in 1962 and President in 1969
/////////////
Yes but Nixon did not quit in the middle of a job he was elected to do. He was beaten in the presidential election in 1960 and the California gubernatorial election in 1962.
Palin is no Reagan, not many will be but hell...YOU OUGHT TO AT LEAST TRY.
Reagan was shot in the chest at the age of 70! With a bullet an inch from his heart, he had every reason to quit ...
but his Leadership represented the Values of Courage Honor and Commitment.
He finished his four year term and then DID FOUR MORE.
THAT is what you yell “Hell yes” to.
No, beginning of story. What's a lightlight?
Your posts are so FOS all across America computer screens are turning brown.
When you can formulate a coherent thought in defense of your American idol that's backed by reason, logic and facts, I'll be happy to continue the discussion. But, I won't engage in name calling sissy fits.
Ironically, you just did.
Reagan cut and run (read QUIT) in Beirut. You do remember the Marine Barrack bombing in Beirut?
A great President. Maybe the greatest of the modern era. But come off of that pedestal.
Palin did what she had to do to extend her political career. She is bigger than Alaska now.
Where Nixon said after he lost in 62...."You won't have Nixon to kick around anymore."
If you are going to use Nixon, remember, he quit too. Nice of you to forget that.
Palin resigning frees her to support candidates across the nation to build a base for 2012. It's not about what she's done, but what she will do.
Welcome to FR.
Sarah Palin is indeed the true political heir of Ronald Reagan. All the phony conservatives and white trash Republicans now maligning her will find futile their insidious efforts to defame her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.