Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Palin's national political career over? (Sadly, the answer is YES)
Hotair ^ | 7/3/2009 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 07/03/2009 5:24:46 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

The news of Sarah Palin’s resignation as governor came during my show this afternoon, where we spent most of an hour discussing it with the chatizens and my co-host Duane Patterson. I’ve had a chance to watch the video of her announcement and read through dozens of Twitter messages back and forth attempting to rationalize this, and still, it simply can’t be rationalized on the basis of what Palin said today. It’s easily the most bizarre resignation I’ve seen, and just about senseless.

The lame-duck explanation was the most incoherent part of the entire statement:

“Once I decided not to run for re-election, I also felt that to embrace the conventional ‘Lame Duck’ status in this particular climate would just be another dose of ‘politics as usual,’ something I campaigned against and will always oppose. It is my duty to always protect our great state. With that in mind, my family and I determined that it is best to make a difference this summer, and I am willing to change things, so that this administration, with its positive agenda, its accomplishments and its successful road to an incredible future, can continue without interruption and with great administrative and legislative success.”

Bear in mind that the election isn’t next month but about 16 months from now, in November 2010. Using this logic, Palin should never have run for the first term unless she was willing to run for the second, and not run for either if she wasn’t willing (or legally able) to run for a third. Politicians don’t enter lame-duck status until their successor has already been elected and they’re running out the rest of the term. And all politicians become lame ducks at some point — and none of them quit just to avoid it.

Also, how can Palin quit because she didn’t want to deal with being a lame duck and claim in the same breath that her administration would “continue without interruption”? She just interrupted it! If she thinks that being a “lame duck” would hamper her ability to push her agenda in the state’s capital, how does she think that an unelected Sean Parnell is going to get it done?

If it’s her duty to always “protect” Alaska, then that strongly implies not walking away from the responsibility of governing it — a responsibility she sought, and with which her constituents trusted her to execute. No one leads by quitting. No one leads by quitting. Palin’s abandoning her post, and at least from her own description, doing it because she doesn’t want to deal with the issues of being a “lame duck,” a status all politicians have to handle at some point.

I’ve seen a myriad of excuses on Twitter and e-mail for this bizarre resignation: her legal bills are too high, she’s putting her family first, she doesn’t want to distract Alaskans because of cheap-shot ethics complaints that are distracting everyone. None of those make any sense. If the spotlight was too much, then she shouldn’t have run for office in the first place. If she’s quitting because people are taking potshots at her, then she’s not the kind of political fighter we thought she was. The legal bills might be a rational reason, but thoroughly insufficient for betraying the people who put her in charge of Alaska — and her memoirs would have paid for her legal bills many times over, had she completed her term.

There’s really no excuse, and what Rich Lowry also calls her “terrible,” “rambling,” and “not at all persuasive” statement showed that. Unless there was a serious illness or a serious scandal, the resignation on the grounds Palin gave is simply incomprehensible. She has destroyed her own credibiity in a single day.

I liked Sarah Palin and supported her inclusion on the GOP ticket last fall. I thought she had more toughness than this. It’s a big disappointment, and it’s the end of any hope of Palin getting taken seriously as a politician on the national level in the future.

Update (AP): I was going to tuck this into one of my own posts but it fits better here. Quin Hillyer, senior editor at the Spectator, calls the resignation an “appalling dereliction of duty.”

What Sarah Palin did today was get out before the real challenges of the job (whatever challenges there are for such an easy job) really rear their heads. The going got tough in terms of spurious ethics charges against her, and she took off. That’s cowardly. That’s not sign of staying power. It’s a sign of wanting to get out while the getting is good, in order to become a full-time candidate for a presidential race that won’t culminate for 3 1/2 more years. It’s a little too calculating, by half — or more.

I just listened to her speech announcing her decision, and found it singularly unimpressive. “This was a rambling, bombastic, self-centered, ‘poor me’ kind of speech.” That’s how Mike Carey of the Anchorage Daily News just described her speech on Fox News. I agree. He then said it was, darn, I already can’t remember if he said it was “pitiful” or “pathetic,” but it was some word like that. Again, I agree. It was a speech in which she clearly made a bit for a national audience — not a very effective bid, but a transparent one — but didn’t adequately explain to the people of Alaska why she was relinquishing her duty…

Statesmen hang tough. Sarah Palin is cutting and running. ‘Nuff said.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: careerishistory; gopimplosion; palin; quitter; resignation; sarahbarraquitta; sarahpalin; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 341-351 next last
To: SeekAndFind

And with those millions she will travel the country and get her conservative message out to the masses.

Those who underestimate Sarah Palin do so at their peril.


81 posted on 07/03/2009 5:49:42 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (If Randy Cunningham is in prison for corruption, then why isn't Diane Feinstein locked up as well?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Are there no men in Alaska who could rid America of this sore on the body politic?

Forget Alaska now. Let's look to Louisiana and/or Indiana now.
82 posted on 07/03/2009 5:49:42 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: filbert
Does anybody remember how Bill Clinton’s career was over after his disastrous 1984 Democratic National Convention speech—the one where the delegates burst into raucous applause when Bill finally got around to saying “and in conclusion?”

That was in 1988, and Clinton was supposed to be done after Gennifer Flowers came out.

83 posted on 07/03/2009 5:50:01 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("President Obama, your agenda is not new, it's not change, and it's not hope" - Rush Limbaugh 02/28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Two Ravens

Timing might be fantastic, just ahead of all the Tea Parties! Guess who’ll be the topic of discussion???


84 posted on 07/03/2009 5:50:04 PM PDT by dusttoyou (Remember the Alamo Tea Party - PALIN 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

another person who likes sarah but questions questions...

look, she ain’t running for Pres now, who knows, maybe ever (I hope not) but this is all about 2010. If good things happen in 2010, she calls more shots in 2012. why is that so hard to understand. I think it’s great she can come down to lower 48 and elect real conservatives? Do you or don’t you?

Do you think people in OH district are going to care if Palin stumps for an R there that she resigned in AK? good grief

with friends like you....


85 posted on 07/03/2009 5:50:12 PM PDT by Piers-the-Ploughman (Just say no to circular firing squads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: dusttoyou; All
I’m with you on jokyfo posts. Either a romneyite or a DU seminar poster.

BINGO! There are a LOT of them suddenly out and about on the Palin threads who I've never seen before.

86 posted on 07/03/2009 5:50:23 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He may be right. Sarah’s old political career is over. Can’t wait to see what the new career brings.


87 posted on 07/03/2009 5:50:37 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I can't help but be reminded of this exchange, early in the Obama pre-campaign campaign.

“My dad told me that you've got to strike while the iron is hot,” Reverend Alvin Love recalls saying, and Obama replied, “The iron can't get any hotter."

Back when Hillary Clinton was The Next In Line, aka The Inevitible One, there was one man who read the terrain correctly, and realized that he could beat The Unbeatable.

Fellas, there's nothing in Palin's background like the Reverend Wright. Everyone who took one look at Barack Obama and laughed him off as a political lightweight with crippling negatives was wrong. Obama ignored the establishment in the media and in the Democratic party, who were all nice but largely dismissive of him early on.

Palin's the only politician we have right now with the same level of natural talent and connection to the average voter that Obama has. If she's mobilizing now, it's because she sees a path to victory, and is taking it. We can laugh at her and dismiss her as flaky and unready, just as the Democrats initially dismissed Obama as an untested rookie. Or we can wait and see if she's actually up to something worth getting on board with.

She's either dumber than we thought, or a lot smarter than we are. Sometimes, vanity gets in the way of making that assessment clearly. It certainly did in our assessment of Obama.

88 posted on 07/03/2009 5:51:19 PM PDT by Steel Wolf (Oh, well. Back to the drawing board....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saquin
Deciding not to run for re-election next year would have been completely understandable. Resigning abruptly like this? Not so understandable.

Precisely. I would have understood it had she merely announced that she would finish her term and not run for a second term. THAT would have been better. But this .... this is really strange.
89 posted on 07/03/2009 5:51:30 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: jokyfo
It doesn’t matter what she believes or doesn’t believes about what she says.

It doesn’t matter what she you believes or doesn’t don't believes about what she you says.

I don't believe you ever wanted her to succeed.
90 posted on 07/03/2009 5:52:53 PM PDT by papasmurf (Save us from 0bama, I prayed. Then I heard, "the 2nd, I saved")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: jokyfo

Oh ye of little faith.


91 posted on 07/03/2009 5:53:43 PM PDT by libbylu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Reagan79
Face it non-elites are not allowed on the national stage.

That's true

92 posted on 07/03/2009 5:53:50 PM PDT by Two Ravens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
She's done. Ed's exactly right. Her convoluted reasons for quitting make no sense at all. American voters don't jump in line behind people who quit after only 2 years on the job... however good those reasons may be.

It is time for us conservatives to get behind someone else. And its too bad because I would have campaigned vigorously for Sarah.

93 posted on 07/03/2009 5:54:25 PM PDT by Guyin4Os (My name says Guyin40s but now I have an exotic, daring, new nickname..... Guyin50s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jokyfo

Your tag line:

JESUS CHRIST: The Light of the world... AMERICA: The light of freedom.

is a put down to Christ’s death on the cross. His death brought us freedom once and for all.


94 posted on 07/03/2009 5:54:32 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

That would be Neuwein and Zwiebelkuchen.


95 posted on 07/03/2009 5:54:33 PM PDT by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
Palin's the only politician we have right now with the same level of natural talent and connection to the average voter that Obama has. If she's mobilizing now, it's because she sees a path to victory, and is taking it.

My problem with this move is the TIMING. She was ELECTED to serve a full 4 year term. The next presidential elections are 3 1/2 years away. Why resign now ?

Why not serve till 2010 and THEN announce that she's not running for a second term ? That would have been the better course of action if she were truly exploring a run for the presidency...
96 posted on 07/03/2009 5:54:37 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

She’s done.

After that rambling wreck of a speech I still don’t know why she is resigning.


97 posted on 07/03/2009 5:54:54 PM PDT by Taking Congress back in 2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jokyfo

Romney ain’t likin’ this.


98 posted on 07/03/2009 5:55:07 PM PDT by onedoug (SARAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sarah Palin is Obi-Wan Kenobi. She just turned off her light saber and the dark side is taking a meaningless swipe. Meanwhile poor Luke is confused and a little frightened.


99 posted on 07/03/2009 5:55:08 PM PDT by modhom (deficits=inflation+taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mono

You and jokyfo friends or just got the same “talking points” fax from axlerod?


100 posted on 07/03/2009 5:55:36 PM PDT by dusttoyou (Remember the Alamo Tea Party - PALIN 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 341-351 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson