Posted on 07/03/2009 5:24:46 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
The news of Sarah Palin’s resignation as governor came during my show this afternoon, where we spent most of an hour discussing it with the chatizens and my co-host Duane Patterson. I’ve had a chance to watch the video of her announcement and read through dozens of Twitter messages back and forth attempting to rationalize this, and still, it simply can’t be rationalized on the basis of what Palin said today. It’s easily the most bizarre resignation I’ve seen, and just about senseless.
The lame-duck explanation was the most incoherent part of the entire statement:
“Once I decided not to run for re-election, I also felt that to embrace the conventional ‘Lame Duck’ status in this particular climate would just be another dose of ‘politics as usual,’ something I campaigned against and will always oppose. It is my duty to always protect our great state. With that in mind, my family and I determined that it is best to make a difference this summer, and I am willing to change things, so that this administration, with its positive agenda, its accomplishments and its successful road to an incredible future, can continue without interruption and with great administrative and legislative success.”
Bear in mind that the election isn’t next month but about 16 months from now, in November 2010. Using this logic, Palin should never have run for the first term unless she was willing to run for the second, and not run for either if she wasn’t willing (or legally able) to run for a third. Politicians don’t enter lame-duck status until their successor has already been elected and they’re running out the rest of the term. And all politicians become lame ducks at some point — and none of them quit just to avoid it.
Also, how can Palin quit because she didn’t want to deal with being a lame duck and claim in the same breath that her administration would “continue without interruption”? She just interrupted it! If she thinks that being a “lame duck” would hamper her ability to push her agenda in the state’s capital, how does she think that an unelected Sean Parnell is going to get it done?
If it’s her duty to always “protect” Alaska, then that strongly implies not walking away from the responsibility of governing it — a responsibility she sought, and with which her constituents trusted her to execute. No one leads by quitting. No one leads by quitting. Palin’s abandoning her post, and at least from her own description, doing it because she doesn’t want to deal with the issues of being a “lame duck,” a status all politicians have to handle at some point.
I’ve seen a myriad of excuses on Twitter and e-mail for this bizarre resignation: her legal bills are too high, she’s putting her family first, she doesn’t want to distract Alaskans because of cheap-shot ethics complaints that are distracting everyone. None of those make any sense. If the spotlight was too much, then she shouldn’t have run for office in the first place. If she’s quitting because people are taking potshots at her, then she’s not the kind of political fighter we thought she was. The legal bills might be a rational reason, but thoroughly insufficient for betraying the people who put her in charge of Alaska — and her memoirs would have paid for her legal bills many times over, had she completed her term.
There’s really no excuse, and what Rich Lowry also calls her “terrible,” “rambling,” and “not at all persuasive” statement showed that. Unless there was a serious illness or a serious scandal, the resignation on the grounds Palin gave is simply incomprehensible. She has destroyed her own credibiity in a single day.
I liked Sarah Palin and supported her inclusion on the GOP ticket last fall. I thought she had more toughness than this. It’s a big disappointment, and it’s the end of any hope of Palin getting taken seriously as a politician on the national level in the future.
Update (AP): I was going to tuck this into one of my own posts but it fits better here. Quin Hillyer, senior editor at the Spectator, calls the resignation an “appalling dereliction of duty.”
What Sarah Palin did today was get out before the real challenges of the job (whatever challenges there are for such an easy job) really rear their heads. The going got tough in terms of spurious ethics charges against her, and she took off. That’s cowardly. That’s not sign of staying power. It’s a sign of wanting to get out while the getting is good, in order to become a full-time candidate for a presidential race that won’t culminate for 3 1/2 more years. It’s a little too calculating, by half — or more.
I just listened to her speech announcing her decision, and found it singularly unimpressive. “This was a rambling, bombastic, self-centered, ‘poor me’ kind of speech.” That’s how Mike Carey of the Anchorage Daily News just described her speech on Fox News. I agree. He then said it was, darn, I already can’t remember if he said it was “pitiful” or “pathetic,” but it was some word like that. Again, I agree. It was a speech in which she clearly made a bit for a national audience — not a very effective bid, but a transparent one — but didn’t adequately explain to the people of Alaska why she was relinquishing her duty…
Statesmen hang tough. Sarah Palin is cutting and running. ‘Nuff said.
“Boss, the job you hired me to do can’t properly be done because liberals ruin everything they touch, so I’ll leave the job in more than capable hands and go take on these idiots where they can be properly dealt with and defeated.”
I don’t think this will change my opinion of her, but I don’t think it will help with the electorate.
Not a chance. Watch and learn. This is one of the smartest women in politics. She's rope-a-doping the press right now. She will get more done by stepping into the beltway arena early. Stay tuned, pal. And buckle up!
Sorry, you lose. You can search my name and find it if you wish.
“Sorry, I did, and you didn’t.”
Actually, your ability to do a search sucks. Try again and say the secret woid and win 500 dollars.
She did not inspire confidence with her speech today. She’s finished. And I wanted her to succeed.
Well, that was my first take but I am beginning to agree with you. It was her best move. I know this, she is driven and the people want her.
I like how Mark Steyn put it today:
(without people like Palin) “National office will dwindle down to the unhealthily singleminded (Clinton, Obama), the timeserving emirs of Incumbistan (Biden, McCain) and dynastic heirs (Bush). Our loss.”
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=N2ZiOTA5MmU0MjQ0ODJmNWI3OGQ4ZTg2ZGE1Nzg5NmE=
If you value your posting privileges, you will stop spamming keywords with defamatory rumor. GOT IT? Or do I have to ban you?
Apparently, you can’t find it either, or you certainly would have given me a link or at least the actual word you used.
It’s not hard to search for words, you just go to the freeper’s page, pull up all their comments, and you can then read them, or when you get tired of that, you can use the IE search function to see what words are on the pages.
That’s how I was able to find the two times you used the word resign, and in both cases they were very negative uses of the word.
I imagine you made a killing in the stock market as well.
Why would I search for something that I said lol.
I was taking it from the Palin supporters hard when I stated that she had to leave Alaska to set up a national organization and raise money.
It turns out that she agrees with my analysis.
Because I asked for references to any freeper who said she should resign before she did it, and you CLAIM you said so, and told me to look at your comments, and when I did, there was NO comment you made in the last 6 months about Palin resigning, until she resigned.
So I would think that, in order to prove your claim, you would provide a reference. Anybody can SAY they said anything, that's why we ask for references.
Since you now claim "I stated that she had to leave Alaska", I checked all of your comments for the word "leave", and once again, I found NO comment in which you used the word "leave" in reference to Palin this year, until after she resigned.
So maybe you said something different, but since twice now you have been unable to remember what you actually said, I think maybe you should go back and re-read your comments. I would be fascinated to read the threads where you had this argument with other freepers, but I can't enjoy them until you tell me where they are, because searching just isn't working.
I’ll get right on it.
It is nice to see what I have been saying about Ed is reaching the masses. He is a MN. rino who does a radio show on a rino network. He loves to attack conservative women like Coulter Bachmann and Palin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.