To: Antoninus
But now, suddenly, Palin was the reason McCain lost?
I guess you didn't see where I said “It wasn’t her fault he lost” even though that's the first thing I said and you even included it in your reply...
Palin did not cause McCain to lose.
But she didn’t help him win, either.
And that means she doesn’t have what it takes to attract the sort of votes we’ll need to defeat 0bama.
133 posted on
07/02/2009 10:57:01 PM PDT by
counterpunch
(In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
To: counterpunch
Palin did not cause McCain to lose. But she didn’t help him win, either.RINO McCain was beyond help....he didn't run like he wanted to win...there was no fire....
137 posted on
07/02/2009 10:58:48 PM PDT by
Niteflyr
("Just because something is free doesn't mean it's good for you".)
To: counterpunch
I guess you didn't see where I said “It wasn’t her fault he lost” even though that's the first thing I said and you even included it in your reply...
Please. Your post made no sense. You started out by saying it wasn't her fault McCain lost, then you proceeded to insist that she didn't help him win. You can't have it both ways.
And that means she doesn’t have what it takes to attract the sort of votes we’ll need to defeat 0bama.
At the moment, she's our best bet. I'd be perfectly comfortable supporting her for president in 2012. Or do you have an alternative?
147 posted on
07/02/2009 11:02:51 PM PDT by
Antoninus
(Queer is boring.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson