Posted on 06/23/2009 5:40:12 AM PDT by fiodora
I'm wondering how long it will be before the word "impeachment" starts being bantered about?
The list of reasons to expel Obama keeps getting longer and stronger, and this is only five months into his reign.
Everyone knows about his inexperience. His rhetorical abilities made people overlook this weakness. Even his eligibility to have become president is becoming an issue.
He places personal and party ideologies over what is best for America. I thought when appointing justices, it was supposed to be "the best person for the job" and "justice is blind." Affirmative-action policies and "empathy" aren't part of the requirements for appointment.
He fits the definition of being a narcissist perfectly. This makes him extremely dangerous for the country. He only cares about what is best for him, not the country.
He is ashamed of our country (as was his wife until Barack won his party's nomination) even though it has given him immense amounts of opportunity. He constantly feels the need to apologize for our country's history of perceived repressiveness.
Sorry, Barack, we are the greatest country in the history of the world. No country has done more for other countries where there has been suppression of human rights, and Americans are unmatched in raising money and supplies for others when natural disasters hit.
You have been hanging around the Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers too long.
You have been going around (the Muslim world in particular), speaking of "the promise of a secular nation." How much more arrogant and ignorant can you be?
Even though you think highly of your rhetorical skills, you are not going to change the fact that a vast majority of Americans believe in God.
Why do you keep implying to other countries that our country was not founded on Judeo-Christian principles?
Your history of duplicity is unmatched. This was illustrated numerous times throughout the campaign. You carry it forward into your presidency.
You incur the largest-ever budget deficit and then insist that we operate on a pay-as-you-go principle from now on. Of course, shortly thereafter, you exempt your government-run health program costs from this rule. You are great with smoke and mirrors, Barack. You are the ultimate flim-flam man.
You are a corrupt man. You appoint tax cheats and disreputable people to positions of power. You promise no lobbyists in your administration, yet no other administration had close to the number you now have.
You fire people who uncover very serious issues of impropriety by organizations run by individuals who are close friends of yours. You had your Justice Department cancel a criminal suit against goons, representing your friends ACORN and the Black Panthers, involving voter intimidation tactics at election polls.
You are dishonest and lie when it serves your purposes. Including examples above, you ridiculed John McCain's idea of taxing employer-funded health insurance premiums, promising never to follow such a policy during your administration.
Change your mind, Obama? You promised no tax increases for individuals making under $250,000. What do you call proposals like getting rid of tax-excludable programs like Health Savings Accounts and Flexible Spending Accounts?
Millions of middle- and low-income individuals participate in these programs. What do you call new taxes proposed on soda and beer? I guess only the rich drink these.
You are proposing one of the largest increases in corporate taxes in history. Who do you think ends up paying for these increased costs of doing business?
I think these mentioned items also fall under the topic of incompetence. And I thought we could never get a leader less competent than Jimmy Carter. I was wrong.
How about your lying to the American Medical Association? You specifically said, "I'll be honest, there are countries where a single-payer system works pretty well."
Why couldn't your press secretary name just one when pressed for an example?
Why did your mainstream media stooges, especially The Washington Post, The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times, specifically leave that quote out of their news articles, but quote everything said before and after that part of your speech perfectly?
You continually show disrespect for and trample on our Constitution, especially when it bars you from enacting your most radical ideas.
There is hope, however. Sixty-six percent of the voters from age 18 to 30 voted for you while only 32 percent voted for McCain. Voters 30 and above, on the other hand, favored you by a margin of only 50 percent to 49 percent.
Do you think you can fool the younger voting bloc twice, Barack? I don't think so, especially when they see the impact of your socialist agenda on their lives. Maybe we won't have to wait another 31/2 years for "change."
He can’t be impeached. He is the lacky of the Rat congress.
############
A RAT congress that will be ousted in 2010!
Do you know what baffles me? Even with all that has been going on with this admin, and its corruption, there are still people out there who don’t know anything about it. I was in Staples the other day getting my system restored, and I was talking to one of the guys that worked there. He said he never heard of ANY of it. My first response was “what news stations have you been listening to?”.
I think between now & 2010, if there is a way to bring down any of the MSM at all, we need to attempt it...this will help greatly!
We do not impeach Presidents who are of the Democrat persuasion. Difference here is ozero is not a Democrat. That party got him in office, but he is a Kenyan. He would be our first Kenyan we have impeached.
Republicans won’t even fight against a racist as SCOTUS nominee. Impeachment? LOL!
amen brother!
Let's see:
1. Congress, both dims and RINOs, fawn over this guy. No way will anything be done. Heck we couldn't even get ONE member of Congress to question his eligibility when the electoral college results were presented.
2. He has ACORN, or whatever they're calling themselves now, firmly in place. No more free or fair elections.
3. He is firing up his Civilian Defense Corps. Remember the picture of the Black Panther at the polling place last time? Look for one on every street corner.
4. He has the courts, and he is already packing the SCOTUS with his radicals - no help there.
I'm not even sure if NK nuked Honolulu that anyone would blame him or take actions for his removal - and Hawaii would still vote for the dems!
Only if the Left resists, like in Indonesia or Chile.
I think they are gutless cowards. It may not be so bad.
“I’m afraid the reboot you’re talking about will be a bit harsher than most people realize...”
##########
My mouth waters at the thought of it!
Thanks you guys. I’ll check it out...and then proudly display it!
Is it incompetence or is it Cloward-Piven?
Fortunately, a little of both.
Gutless is right. Once voted in, most do as they please. Something in the air in D.C.?
Except for Clinton and Johnson, yeah, I guess that’s true :-)
“We do not impeach Presidents who are of the Democrat persuasion. Difference here is ozero is not a Democrat. That party got him in office, but he is a Kenyan. He would be our first Kenyan we have impeached.”
***********
I hope you’re right, re: him being impeached. I hope the impeachment results in his removal from office (unlike Clintax’s, where he hung around for another year).
Impeach the Zero, and impeach him now.
The sooner the better (and the Rockefeller shadow govt behind the scenes will be rattled!)
http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/26742/
Sounds like you are on the same path as the author of the letter referenced above. There is also a link on that page to sign a petition. I have done so and have encouraged everyone I know to as well. Many people will be traveling to D.C. in September to protest. While I will not be able to go, I am proud to have those that can represent me.
Like you, I wonder how long we will have to endure this before someone demands an impeachment. Let's face it, Clinton was brought up for impeachment for much less.
And this is where Saul Alinsky, socialism, Tocqueville and the entire weight of human history get in the way. How do you win a war against an enemy who refuses to acknowledge the rules that you limit yourself by? The federal government frees voter intimidation thugs and stops states from clearing their voter rolls of fraud. They seize private companies and dictate the economy. And the 'loyal opposition' in Washington is very big on loyal and very small on opposition.
What do you define as kook when American democracy is slowly setting over the hills and the shadows of the future grow longer?
Ping~
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.