[BP2]

Good to see Mr. Walpin isn't intimidated by the Obama slime machine!

[TaxRelief]

If he doesn’t get his hearing now, he’ll get it in 2010.

[Tzimisce]

Obama’s party controls Congress.

Even if they do call hearings (which is unlikely), they’re not going to find the Messiah has done anything wrong.

[Ditto]

He said that he believed the Democratic majority in Congress would support an investigation.

ROTFLMAO. Congress Critters from either party rarely allow honesty to get in the way of their pork, and when it's Democrat politicians, those in the way can fully expect to be slaughtered and not a whimper will escape to the rest of the heard. Sorry Mr. Walprin. After 78 years of being a loyal Democrat, they have decided that you are now 'inconvenient.'

ABCSeeBSNBC will promptly assign your story to the memory hole and it will be just like you never existed.

[M. Espinola]

With the type of nauseating pomposity Obama displays, almost always with this ultra-arrogant type, something hidden from the public pops up and ruins their credibility.

We can only hope when it happens impeachment quickly follows — the problem is getting enough votes for approval of impeachment implementation.

[TheThinker]

Sunlight is the best disinfectant and Obama opposes transparency because he knows it will cure the epidemic of corruption that he inspires.

[matthew fuller]

"He says he wants Congress to hold a hearing on his firing."

If that is all that he has in his arsenal, he is so screwed!

[bustinchops]

Ostammer and his thugs will give Walpin and the rest of the people mentioned the finger as they do on everything else. Then the pussy Republicans will just bend over and take it, as usual.

[csense]

“I think it’s absolutely desperation on their part,” Walpin said. “The first reason they gave me for my termination was that the president thought I ought to move on. The second reason the president expressed was that he lost confidence in me. That was in a letter to Congress. Of course that’s not a reason, that’s a conclusion.”>/u>

And right you are. This is a distinction that most people either miss, or simply don't understand, which proves to me that Mr. Walpin is not only sharp as a tack, but is in full control of his mental faculties. I wouldn't want him breathing down my neck if I've got something to hide. If Walpin keeps pushing this with the clarity and conviction he has shown so far, Obama may be in some real trouble here, especially since a pattern is emerging.

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

Was Gibbs asked about this? Why is it no reporter is asking Obama about Walpin? AKA calling him to the carpet?

[Munz]

yeah but with this congress in the pocket of Obama, how far will it really go?

[nikos1121]

My understanding is Walpin is a staunch democrat and liberal. He firmly supported Obama for president.

[Freedom2specul8]

I missed this one, thanks for posting..

[ridesthemiles]

Good to see Mr. Walpin isn’t intimidated by the Obama slime machine!”””

I will donate $10 out of my Social Security check to Mr Walpin for a legal fund if someone can provide me with a correct address/contact.