Define your terms such as "stark reality of existence".
Demonstrate how those on this thread, with whom you disagree, are avoiding it; and then describe who they are using supernatural explanations to avoid said "stark reality".
You're talking like a homosexual activist or AGW proponent.
Using ad hominem strawmen to attack one's ideological opponents, while presenting oneself as an apostle of logical thought and empiricism, is worse than silly.
Cheers!
A reality based on empirical evidence that does not require supernatural explanations for unexplained phenomena or provide for a psychic existence beyond death.
Demonstrate how those on this thread, with whom you disagree, are avoiding it...
By utilizing said supernatural explanations, i.e. Young Earth Creationism.
...and then describe who they are using supernatural explanations to avoid said "stark reality".
I have no idea what you intended to say...
You're talking like a homosexual activist or AGW proponent. Using ad hominem strawmen to attack one's ideological opponents...
Nice steaming pile of hypocrisy there, eh? Cheers yourself!