Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2

You are right. We don’t have anything concrete that says he is legally able to hold the office of POTUS. He wasn’t vetted.


62 posted on 06/19/2009 8:32:04 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: freekitty
We have a certified legal document stating he was born in the State of Hawaii - which is legally sufficient for the citizenship eligibility requirement.

Before you say/type another word on the subject, read this post and study the linked images.

At this point, sufficient legal vetting has occurred. Insofar as circumstances, doubt & irregularities abound, none have provided compelling legal proof of ineligibility. (Don't get me wrong. There's a difference between supporting the !@#$% and acknowledging that one's opposition may actually have the upper hand in the dispute.)

We now return to our previously scheduled thread...

If you DON'T answer all the questions, and are duly fined, that may very well give you "standing" to challenge BHO's eligibility (per the above blather) to compel you to answer those extra-Constitutional 4th-Amendment-violating questions.

72 posted on 06/19/2009 8:49:25 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (John Galt was exiled.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson