[ctdonath2]

We have a certified legal document stating he was born in the State of Hawaii - which is legally sufficient for the citizenship eligibility requirement.

Before you say/type another word on the subject, read this post and study the linked images.

At this point, sufficient legal vetting has occurred. Insofar as circumstances, doubt & irregularities abound, none have provided compelling legal proof of ineligibility. (Don't get me wrong. There's a difference between supporting the !@#$% and acknowledging that one's opposition may actually have the upper hand in the dispute.)

We now return to our previously scheduled thread...

If you DON'T answer all the questions, and are duly fined, that may very well give you "standing" to challenge BHO's eligibility (per the above blather) to compel you to answer those extra-Constitutional 4th-Amendment-violating questions.

[freekitty]

So you are a troll. Don't buy what you are saying. Factcheck is a fraud and you know it; so don't go blowing baloney bs to me.

[Munz]

i think that the most compelling arguments are that his father was Kenyan according to him which makes him ineligible.

I posted quite a bit on my blog here with the necessary laws to make that point clear, along with the findings of John McCain’s eligibility hearings which are quite telling.

http://themunz.blogspot.com/2009/06/why-obama-wants-to-hide-birth_16.html

Let me know what you think.