It is of 2001 origin with the latest update I can find in 2006. See below. The link is
http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/dod/i2000_16.pdf
This basic document is Bush Admin era. The test mentioned is not contained in the basic document...at least I can’t find it.
TITLE: DoD Instruction 2000.16, “DoD Antiterrorism (AT) Standards”, 10/2/2006; Incorporating through Change 2, December 8, 2006
SUMMARY: This Instruction:
Reissues DoD Instruction 2000.16 dated June 14, 2001 to update policy implementation, responsibilities, and the antiterrorism (AT) standards for the DoD Components under the authority of DoD Directive 2000.12 for the protection of DoD elements and personnel from acts of terrorism. This update reorganizes the AT standards listed in Enclosure 3 according to the minimum required elements for an AT program: risk management, planning, training and exercises, resource application, and comprehensive program review. It also cancels DoD Instruction 2000.14.
Expands protection of DoD installations to recognize the importance of defending against terrorist use of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and high explosive (CBRNE) weapons according to DoD Instruction 2000.18.
Expands requirements to DoD Instruction 5200.08 and DoD 5200.8-R (to address the linkages between AT and Physical Security Programs.
CHANGES:
Change 1, 10/31/2006
Change 2, 12/8/2006
FILES:
PDF(210 KB) RTF(953 KB)
OPR: USD(P), 703-695-5136
I agree. If we can control protesters at political conventions - and they are kept blocks away - it's the least we can do for the men and women who protect us.
This isn't saying people can't "protest" but they can't "protest" without some restrictions if they're near a DOD facility or American soldiers protecting us. This is starting to come across as OK. What do you think xzines?