Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
Since the purpose of the course is “Force Protection”, then I agree that “protests” are a means of low-level terrorism.

I agree. If we can control protesters at political conventions - and they are kept blocks away - it's the least we can do for the men and women who protect us.

This isn't saying people can't "protest" but they can't "protest" without some restrictions if they're near a DOD facility or American soldiers protecting us. This is starting to come across as OK. What do you think xzines?

63 posted on 06/17/2009 10:14:25 AM PDT by GOPJ (ABC's a dem whore - cheap and easy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: GOPJ

The US military should not be used in internal to the US operations that are on the civil side.

They are a force that gets projected, therefore, any protests they are a part of are going to be in the nature of civil affairs operations in occupied countries or countries being traversed.

Soldiers overseas should always be wary of the potential for terrorism inherent in large crowds, especially in protests.


64 posted on 06/17/2009 10:27:52 AM PDT by xzins (Chaplain Says: Jesus befriends those who seek His help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson