Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USAF To Arm B-2A With Massive Bunker-Buster Bomb
Flight International ^ | June 9, 2009 | By Stephen Trimble

Posted on 06/16/2009 4:19:07 PM PDT by Fennie

The US Air Force today revealed plans to acquire a small arsenal of a new 13,600kg (30,000lb) penetrator bomb to deploy on Northrop Grumman B-2As in three years.

The USAF's public notice follows several years of testing the Boeing GBU57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), which is designed to destroy hardened bunkers buried deeply underground.

The USAF plans to begin flight tests on the B-2A starting in June 2011 and reach operational status by June 2012, the USAF notice says. Integrating the MOP requires no changes to the B-2A's operational flight programme, avoiding a potentially costly and time-consuming recertification process.

The USAF's "best estimate" anticipates buying five test and 10 residual MOP bombs. But another five residual bombs could also be purchased, the USAF notice says.

In previous years, lawmakers had rejected the previous Administration's requests to fund a "quick reaction capability" to buy up to 20 MOPs for the B-2A fleet.

But the opposition from Congress appears to have faded, allowing the USAF to move forward with development and procurement of the 15t bunker-buster bombs.

(Excerpt) Read more at flightglobal.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: Missouri; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: agenda; ahmadinejad; airstrikes; b2; bho44; bhoiran; democrats; iran; iraq; islam; israel; military; nuclear; obama; usaf; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 06/16/2009 4:19:07 PM PDT by Fennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Big BOOM!


2 posted on 06/16/2009 4:23:23 PM PDT by rahbert (The rule of law is the foundation of our freedom..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Hmmm what upgrades are in the pipe to the B2 to make it a B2-A model ?


3 posted on 06/16/2009 4:23:51 PM PDT by tophat9000 ( We are "O" so f---ed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lil'freeper; big'ol_freeper; SLB

Well at least the LSI can build a big bomb!


4 posted on 06/16/2009 4:24:16 PM PDT by sauropod (People who do things are people that get things done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

MOP up


5 posted on 06/16/2009 4:24:21 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

Modify the bomb bay for a MOP?


6 posted on 06/16/2009 4:26:22 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 148 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Give some to Israel and have them run tests in Iran.


7 posted on 06/16/2009 4:26:59 PM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
much more info. here.
< http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/dshtw.htm >

8 posted on 06/16/2009 4:27:57 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (When you put Democrats in charge, stupid / deadly things happen... :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan

I assume these are for destroying the “compounds” of right wing militia in potentially secessionary states?


9 posted on 06/16/2009 4:30:29 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

I wonder it they have orders to go after Levin in his bunker?


10 posted on 06/16/2009 4:37:40 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Isn’t a daisy cutter 5000 lbs? and this is 6 times greater?

whoa.
lol!


11 posted on 06/16/2009 5:07:40 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (A woman will be the next President; I hope it's Palin instead of HRC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

The first model in an aircraft series is the A model. Any future upgrades could result in a B-2B.


12 posted on 06/16/2009 5:35:14 PM PDT by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan

I understand your zeal, but if you give advanced military equipment to Israel, somehow the Chinese build a knockoff in a half dozen years.


13 posted on 06/16/2009 6:31:18 PM PDT by GAB-1955 (I write books, love my wife, serve my nation, and believe in the Resurrection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Why bother? The B-2A is so weather-sensitive, fragile, and expensive that it’ll never be deployed to any hemispehere that contains a bunker that needs busting.


14 posted on 06/16/2009 7:50:29 PM PDT by flowerplough (Bammy = Oprah = Clinton = most elected Democrats, successfully feigning compassion for money&power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ops33
"The first model in an aircraft series is the A model. Any future upgrades could result in a B-2B."

You learn something new everyday. With personal weapons systems it's a little different. A alpha-designator after the model name, would indicate some kind of variant. ie. M16, M16A1, M16a2 or M1911, M1911A1

15 posted on 06/17/2009 12:11:55 AM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er
Isn’t a daisy cutter 5000 lbs? and this is 6 times greater?

Let's have a little bit of economy here! (I oppose government waste!)

Look, in a confined space, you don't get much more bang for your buck from sizing up your gross bang level, since you get so much unpleasantness from the initial, entry-level sort of bang, like a 750-pound bomb. One of those going off in an Iranian supersecret weapons lab would pretty well spoil everyone's day already.

So what happens if you take a garden-variety daisy-cutter, suitably accessorized to play an authentic period Jimi Hendrix guitar solo on the way down, screw several segments of a space-shuttle SRB onto its ass end programmed to ignite during descent, and see what that'll penetrate, break, and generally spoil? Bet it wouldn't leave much to MOP up.

16 posted on 06/17/2009 1:53:08 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough
The B-2A is so weather-sensitive, fragile, and expensive that it’ll never be deployed to any hemispehere that contains a bunker that needs busting.

The B-2 has been deployed to every bomber base in the USAF inventory. One even crashed off Guam. Birds, I think. The B-2 has been used extensively over Iraq and Afghanistan.

17 posted on 06/17/2009 2:41:35 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr

But the stealth bomber’s RAM coating is quite delicate like glass, unlike the Raptor’s durable and robust RAM coating, which can even take acid rain.


18 posted on 06/17/2009 4:23:35 AM PDT by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
The B-2 has been deployed to every bomber base... used extensively over Iraq and Afghanistan

If you say so... This is the kind of stuff I've been reading about the B-2 for years:

The most expensive aircraft ever, each of the 21 B-2s costs over $2 billion (development and construction costs combined). The 170 ton aircraft can carry 22 tons of bombs. There's not a big need for the B-2 at the moment, as the older B-1s and B-52s can deliver bombs cheaper, and just as reliably. Smart bombs have greatly reduced the need for heavy bombers, since one smart bomb ... (http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htatrit/articles/20080428.aspx?comments=Y)

And "The Buff (B-52) fleet's cumulative mission capable rate from March 2000 through March 2001 was 80.5 percent, said Air Combat Command officials. The B-1 Lancer's rate was 53.7 percent and the B-2 Spirit's 30.3. (http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0IBP/is_6_45/ai_77106313/)
19 posted on 06/17/2009 4:56:18 AM PDT by flowerplough (Bammy = Oprah = Clinton = most elected Democrats, successfully feigning compassion for money&power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er

The BLU-82 Daisy Cutter is 15,000lbs if I remember correctly. The explosives account for 12,600lbs.

It’s replacement is the GBU-43 MOAB. That’s 22,000lbs with 18,000 of it being explosives. Unlike the unguided Daisy Cutter, the MOAB is GPS guided.

The MOP (GBU-57) is 30,000lbs with a 6,000lb warhead. The previous large bunker buster was the GBU-28 which was about 5,000lbs with a 600lb warhead.


20 posted on 06/17/2009 5:05:52 AM PDT by OA5599
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson