Posted on 06/15/2009 7:04:19 PM PDT by FromLori
President Barack Obama has fired the inspector general who found misuse of AmeriCorps funds at a nonprofit education group headed by Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson. The inspector general, Gerald Walpin, had investigated Johnson’s group, St. HOPE Academy, and discovered funds were being diverted for non-approved uses.
AP reported on June 12 that Obama was citing his loss of confidence in Walpin to explain the firing. While the acting U.S. attorney in Sacramento had criticized Walpin for how he conducted the investigation, prosecutors did find fault with St. HOPE Academy’s sloppy record keeping and reached a settlement. The Academy maintained its innocence, yet it still agreed to return about $424,000 out of the $850,000 it had received. At this point, the president stepped in to fire Walpin without listing any substantial reasons.
What makes Obama’s action questionable is that Johnson is a big supporter of the president. As soon as Walpin finds that Johnson is using AmeriCorps grant money to pay volunteers to engage in school-board political activities, to run errands, and to wash his car, the president gets involved and cans Walpin. He could have at least waited so as not to give the impression of seeking retribution against Walpin.
Not only that, but Obama himself sponsored the Inspectors General Reform Act in 2008. The act is meant to give inspectors general some protection from interference as they do their jobs, especially interference by the White House. It stipulates that the president shall give 30 days’ notice before dismissing an inspector general, and also requires him to state the reasons for his decision. At this point, Obama may be allowing the 30 days, but he is not supplying any objective validation for his action.
The (Washington) Examiner on June 11 quoted a letter from Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) to the president saying that he “was troubled to learn that [on the night of June 10] your staff reportedly issued an ultimatum to the AmeriCorps Inspector General Gerald Walpin that he had one hour to resign or be terminated.” This hints at an effort to avoid even the 30-day requirement by strong-arming Walpin into leaving. But Walpin would not go quietly.
Walpin’s statements, noted by The Examiner, indicate that the criticism from the U.S. attorney in Sacramento was an effort to discredit Walpin after the attorney’s office failed to stifle the suit. Walpin found “six specific instances of diversion and misuse of [AmeriCorps] grant funds,” yet Johnson failed to present “a single fact to dispute those findings.” Even the settlement for $424,000 is not all it’s cracked up to be. Walpin points out: “As St. HOPE is insolvent, the absence of any obligation imposed on [Johnson], and the absence of any guarantee or security to ensure payment, makes the settlement a farce.”
Senator Grassley wrote in his letter to the president that “there have been no negative findings against Mr. Walpin by the Integrity Committee of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency,” that “he has identified millions of dollars in AmeriCorps funds either wasted outright or spent in violation of established guidelines,” and that “it appears he has been doing his job.”
The full story remains to be told, but President Obama could have avoided the appearance of impropriety by not being in such a hurry to get rid of someone who apparently caught one of his supporters red handed. Unfortunately, no one is paying attention to the millions of dollars in other waste or violation that Grassley said Walpin has found. This waste, fraud, and abuse is the price of trusting government to run programs like AmeriCorps.
By putting government in charge of volunteer service or any other unconstitutional program, not only are millions of taxpayer dollars wasted or stolen, the effort to police how funds are used eats up even more of the taxpayers’ money. If there were no AmeriCorps, the government wouldn’t need an inspector general to watch over it. Walpin would no doubt find employment in the private sector, and President Obama would surely benefit by not having this particular reason to make himself look bad.
A BIG noise needs to be made about this....
That’s really big right there! Even bigger than the firing of attorneys during Bush.
Dudes and Dudettes - Obama is from Chicago. Firing the guy is probably the least lethal method of termination Obama knows. Whistle blowers beware, a new administration is in town and this one doesn’t look kindly on those who point fingers at their friends.
Grassley Demands Details on Fired AmeriCorps IG
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/us_americorps_inspector_general/2009/06/15/225444.html
im so sick of obama...i cant stand this...............................
You got that right.
Me too it feels like an eternity already
The IG was on Glenn Beck’s TV show tonight and laid it out in no uncertain terms.
Congress can make Obama answer for this.
Did obozo fire all the US attorneys like clintoon did? Yet, when Pres Bush tried to fire the US attorneys (who are Schedule C employes, i.e., political types) the RATS called for hearings & denounced the action as criminal. Now an “acting US attorney” criticized Walpin. This “acting” is an obozo supporter. I hope he/she gets fired when the PUBS take power again.
The law requires 3 days notice and for the cause to be specified.
Obama did neither.
He’s a crook...
Why would they want to? He's a Democrat; the Democrats rule Congress. Walpin was a white guy going after a black politician, so he had to be fired.
Why are they focusing on the Sacramento mayor? He pocketed less than half a million dollars.
That’s small potatoes compared to the 75 million Walpin says is missing or misspent from the Americorp program at CUNY. That’s the real reason he’s being fired.
Michelle’s former chief of staff will be running that program.
Darn, it is going to be a long 4 years.
And I thought Obama was going to be like white on rice when it came to exposing corruption ...
Oh, I forgot ... except his friends !!!
Inspector ‘s general cannot be fired with out 30 days notice to congress and cause.
Obama sponsored this law as a senator and broke it as president.
He broke the law and must be impeached
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.