Posted on 06/10/2009 2:43:22 PM PDT by LdSentinal
The man accused of opening fire at the Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC on June 10, James W. von Brunn, left a trail of unhinged writings around the internet.
The anti-semitism of von Brunn is the first thing one notices when visiting these bizarre websites. However, like those of most "white supremacists", many of von Brunn's political views track "Left" rather than "Right." Clearly, a re-evaluation of these obsolete definitions is long overdue.
For example, he unleashed his hatred of both Presidents Bush and other "neo-conservatives" in online essays. As even some "progressives" such as the influential Adbusters magazine publicly admit, "neoconservative" is often used as a derogatory code word for "Jews". As well, even a cursory glance at "white supremacist" writings reveals a hatred of, say, big corporations that is virtually indistinguishable from that of anti-globalization activists.
James von Brunn's advocacy of 9/11 conspiracy theories also gives him an additional commonality with individuals on the far-left.
None of this will surprise readers of Jonah Goldberg's bestseller Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change , which clearly demonstrates that "fascism" of the kind advocated by the British National Party (BNP) and the likes of James W. von Brunn is just as likely to reflect "leftwing" views as "rightwing" ones.
In fact, anti-semitism is something the New Left and the "Far Right" have had in common since the 1980s, which is why so many former leftists like David Horowitz defected from one side to the other during the Reagan era and beyond. It also helps explain the otherwise baffling alliance between the Left and radical Islam.
That this shooting occurred shortly after President Obama's former mentor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, blamed "the Jews" for his lack of access to his former parishioner is a troubling confluence of events as well.
How it was discovered? The Internet allows use to read the alleged shooter's rantings on an electronic bulletin board. This board happened to be in support of Ron Paul. Logic would dictate that the alleged shooter supports Paul, but then again logic and you seem to be at odds with one another.
You better find out and start a thread about that guy too.
Nah, I'll stick to Ron Turd.
I am in no way defending this person. But his ‘prior conviction’ was a complaint about a citizens arrest at the federal reserve to arrest them for treason. Knowing what you know about the federal reserve and the corruption of our government with respect to AIG, the bank ‘bailouts’ and GM, does anyone believe that the federal reserve isn’t committing treason against us?
The media, DK, and HP are breathlessly trying to lend credence to that idiotic right-winged extremist report that Janet Nappy-head at the DHS crafted in April on the heels of the Tea Party’s.
Both.
The Southern Poverty Law center keeps records on private citizens as young as junior high school. The federal government, can’t by law do this, but they have a corrupt relationship with the privacy pirates at SPLC to get information they would normally need to conduct an investigation or get a court order to discover.
It’s not a joking matter.
If you are associated with the Southern Poverty Law center please acknowledge that your posts are not those of an independent thinker.
“How it was discovered? The Internet allows use to read the alleged shooter’s rantings on an electronic bulletin board.”
That’s very very interesting. I wasn’t aware that “bulletin boards” were in widespread use anymore, since the advent of the web. Are you in charge of the investigation? Or are you a Ron Paul supporter? Or a white supremacist? Or just a garden variety know-it-nothing?
“Logic would dictate that the alleged shooter supports Paul”
This thread seems to be about Ron Paul and a white supremacist that you seem to be very familiar with (fan club?). What does your logic tell you now?
“Nah, I’ll stick to Ron Turd.”
TMI!
You've provided no credible evidence of that...a spam posting on a Yahoo! Groups list, a post that doesn't even reference Paul is not evidence. Such a claim lacking in evidence means that you are a liar.
Even if he had in some way "supported" some candidate, it would be irrelevant since the candidate is not responsible for unsolicited actions of others. Suppose it turns out that Brunn actually voted for McCain/Palin...your idiot "logic" would mean that Brunn's actions should be held against Palin and all her supporters.
And most Freepers don't believe that 9/11 was an "inside job" and hate Jews.
And Ron Paul, and most of his supports, didn't believe that either.
Ron Turd routinely supports terrorist organizations such as Hamas over Israel.
A repeated LdUrineal lie.
Perhaps you will see the Swastika that will be sure to be inscribed on Ron Turd's gravestone.
Sounds like a terrorist threat here...you may have something in common with Brunn.
And since you've slimed me for being a Paul delegate, which stands-for-nothing candidate were you a delegate for...or did you just hurl insults at Paul from your computer on FR?
Good grief. You're writing on an electronic bulletin board right now. It's terrific that you survived that partial-birth abortion, but it seems to have made you a Ron Turd fanatic.
This thread seems to be about Ron Paul and a white supremacist that you seem to be very familiar with (fan club?). What does your logic tell you now?
That you're an idiot. The insane ramblings of the alleged shooter indicated he's a Paul supporter.
Get it? Good boy, have a cookie.
Apparently LdSentinal is not an independent thinker but is here to support the position of the Southern Poverty Law center which receives tax incentives among other perquisites to collect data on private citizens including children!, and give it to the federal government which allows the federal government to skirt a number of privacy protections afforded by the US Constitution.
Wasted bandwidth in this particular thread.
Enter Alinsky! The Southern Poverty Law Center school of posting.
Yes it does. Would Ron Paul supporters be posting on a Obama or McCain site or a Ron Paul site? More likely the latter. If you can't see that then you're 3 brain cells are not functioning again.
As for assertion that the alleged shooter voted for McCain/Palin, it would be doubtful since his Internet writings indicate a deep hatred of McCain.
And since you've slimed me for being a Paul delegate, which stands-for-nothing candidate were you a delegate for...or did you just hurl insults at Paul from your computer on FR?
Ooh, the moronic newbie gets his feelings hurt. Boo Hoo. Congrats on being a Ron Turd delegate. I see that most of Turd's delegate are escapees from an insane asylum.
I suppose you’re right. But no time like the present to expose the Southern Poverty Law Center to those who may not yet have heard of their anti-American slant.
You’re a regular Sherlock Holmes/Columbo.
I’m ashamed for you.
Ahhh, I bet this never gets out via the lamestream media.</l>
Ditto.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.