Yes, wasn’t that an amazing statement. This guy should lose his law degree for a few years over that one.
I think Kagan is a woman (but she looks like a man.)
Here’s the gub’mint brief, I presume by Kagan of the Solicitor General’s office. I haven’t looked at it yet, but some commentary says that the issue deals with what is the proper use of TARP money, not the secured v. unsecured creditors issue.
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/sg-response-chrysler-6-8-09.pdf