To: mrmeangenes; wagglebee
How is that MORE pertinent? You mean, because it was more wrong to kill Tiller than for Tiller to kill all those babies? (Wagglebee, how many babies are we talking here?)
20 posted on
06/07/2009 3:15:00 PM PDT by
BykrBayb
(Fight the bastards or perish! ~ Jim Robinson ~ Þ)
To: metmom
26 posted on
06/07/2009 3:17:50 PM PDT by
BykrBayb
(Fight the bastards or perish! ~ Jim Robinson ~ Þ)
To: BykrBayb
I believe Tiller admitted to 60,000 that he led to the slaughter!
To: BykrBayb
You mean, because it was more wrong to kill Tiller than for Tiller to kill all those babies? Tiller, while he may have had a high body count, is more worse than any other abortionist.
For that matter, if one can justify killing Tiller, one could also justify killing a woman who had an abortion.
36 posted on
06/07/2009 3:29:28 PM PDT by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: BykrBayb; mrmeangenes
The number that everyone seemed to agree on (including Tiller) was 60 THOUSAND dead babies.
67 posted on
06/07/2009 4:07:54 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson