Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts

You left out the entire context of Augustine’s argument. He was arguing against the “highly mendacious documents” of the pagans which purported to give a history of the human race of many thousands of years, and none of which agreed with each other.

But be that as it may, Augustine is arguing there about the date *of the creation of the human race*—NOT the creation of the world, which as you know as two separate things, especially if one holds some variant of the day-age hypothesis.

And while I’m on the subject, Augustine didn’t believe the universe was created in six days either. He believed it was all created SIMUL = “simultaneously” and that the 6 days in Genesis represent progressive revelations to the angels. ANd he ALSO said in his “On the Literal Interpretation of Genesis” that it was an extraordinarily difficult text to interpret and that perhaps a better explanation could be found than that which he was offering.

He was not reckless with the text. He was careful. So his admonition stands against those who prop up one explanation and pretend to speak for all of Christianity in this regard instead of being a little more humble and admitting that we don’t have all the answers.


41 posted on 06/04/2009 9:27:33 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Claud

Wrong XXX. When Augustin said that not more than “6000 years have yet passed,” he was referring to all of creation. Where he differed from biblical creationists is that he thought creation occurred in an instant, whereas biblical creationists believed creation occurred over six Earth days.


43 posted on 06/04/2009 9:34:26 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson