Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clive
FWIW I seriously doubt that the cause of this disaster was a lightning strike.

I agree - modern planes deal with lightning easily. So, what are some other possibilities? (No distress call - no odd data sent in - no Maydays... nothing.) What's left?

8 posted on 06/03/2009 7:41:52 AM PDT by GOPJ (Fight the Machine - Quit supporting the MSM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GOPJ
TWA 800:


12 posted on 06/03/2009 7:48:03 AM PDT by zeebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: GOPJ

Well...turbulence is a possibility, as they were cruising in an area of fairly strong thunderstorms, although turbulence hasn’t been directly responsible for the destruction of a jetliner in a long time. Two Qantas A330s experienced recent problems with their air data computers, one of them had an “upset” (a momentary loss of control until the pilots could wrestle it back) as a result. An inflight fire is always a possibility like on Swissair 111 in 1998. And you can’t yet rule out the possibility of some sort of explosive device or sabotage.

All we know is that Air France got a sequence of automated messages from the airplane between 2:10 and 2:14 GMT that morning, listing an increasing series of things going wrong. Sometime after 2:14, the plane crashed, out of voice and radar contact with anybody.

}:-)4


14 posted on 06/03/2009 7:48:47 AM PDT by Moose4 (Hey RNC. Don't move toward the middle. MOVE THE MIDDLE TOWARD YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson