Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National Sales Tax Gets Fresh Look; Rahm Emanuel's brother advises 10% VAT...
Washington Post ^ | 5/27/2009 | Lori Montgomery

Posted on 05/27/2009 5:38:44 AM PDT by GreaterSwiss

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-360 next last
To: pleikumud
AFFT FAQ:
I know the FairTax rate is 23 percent when compared to current income and Social Security rate quotes. What is the rate of the sales tax at the retail counter?

30 percent. This issue is often confusing, so we explain more here....

301 posted on 05/27/2009 3:10:35 PM PDT by lewislynn (What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in common? Disinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: demoskowitz
Mexico is looking better every day.
302 posted on 05/27/2009 3:15:16 PM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
This is a big lie. There is nothing visible about a VAT.

As is the INCOME TAX.

303 posted on 05/27/2009 3:20:06 PM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

I think a VAT and a high-end income tax have got to be in the toilet.


304 posted on 05/27/2009 3:31:10 PM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

Absolutely.


305 posted on 05/27/2009 3:33:03 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (The box is broken. You don't have any choice now but to think outside of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: demoskowitz

Roger Hedgecock busting out the soundbites from Ezekiel Emanuel on this now!
RogerHedgecock.Com


306 posted on 05/27/2009 3:37:48 PM PDT by RadioCirca1970 (Victory or Death in the War on Terror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pleikumud
Fairtax double talk:
We may report the tax rate as $25/$125 = 20 percent, which is the tax-inclusive rate (meaning that the tax is included in the base).
In sales "the base price" is the price before tax.
Alternately, we may think of the tax rate as $25/$100 = 25 percent, which is the tax-exclusive rate (meaning the tax is excluded from the base).
"The base" is taxable income. How do you exclude some taxable income from all of the taxable income?

If you have to write an essay to explain your sales tax rate...you're lying.

If you have to lie about the rate, what else are you lying about?

307 posted on 05/27/2009 3:41:24 PM PDT by lewislynn (What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in common? Disinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: demoskowitz

If Obama’s manages to transform the economy into his glorious vision, we will wind up with a permanent class of unemployed, about 20-30% of the workforce. This is on top of welfare recipients.

You can just look to Europe for our future, where it is acceptable to list your occupation as “unemployed”. I believe the economy was bound to take a permanent downward turn no matter who was president, but Obama will fundamentally cripple it.


308 posted on 05/27/2009 3:50:42 PM PDT by kamikaze2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demoskowitz

From my experience this occurs when the government overtaxes and people cheat on income taxes. It’s also a tax on the poorer segment of the population and hampers the expansion of the economy. We are becoming a third world cesspool.


309 posted on 05/27/2009 4:21:26 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demoskowitz

Spend, spend, spend spend, tax, tax, tax. The only plan these idiots seem to have....


310 posted on 05/27/2009 4:22:53 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

As the FairTax gains more national attention, questions have again arisen about whether the FairTax rate is 23 percent or 30 percent. In the toxic environment that often accompanies public policy debates, FairTax.org has even been accused by some of misleading the public, even though full descriptions of “tax-inclusive” and “tax-exclusive” calculations abound on our Web site. We hope the following explanation puts all such questions to rest — at last.

Let’s use an example to illustrate the difference between tax-inclusive and tax-exclusive tax rates.

Assume there is a worker named Joe who earns $125 and spends all of his earnings. Let’s further assume that the government requires him to pay $25 in taxes.

If the government put a tax on Joe’s income, he would earn $125 before tax and would have $100 after tax to spend at the General Store. Thus, Joe has to earn $125 to have $100 to spend. Joe would also have to file an income tax return.

If the government put a tax on what Joe spends, he would earn $125 and would have $125 to spend at the store. Of the $125 paid by Joe to the storekeeper, $100 would be for the goods he bought at the store and $25 would be taxes that the storekeeper would send to the government. Joe would not have to file a tax return, as the storekeeper sends the tax in to the government.

Either way, Joe pays $25 in taxes and the government gets $25 in taxes. With a tax on income, Joe pays the $25 directly to the government, and with the tax on spending (sales tax), he pays the $25 in taxes indirectly when he buys something from the General Store. The General Store sends the tax that Joe paid to the government.

We may report the tax rate as $25/$125 = 20 percent, which is the tax-inclusive rate (meaning that the tax is included in the base). Alternately, we may think of the tax rate as $25/$100 = 25 percent, which is the tax-exclusive rate (meaning the tax is excluded from the base). The 23 percent FairTax rate set out in HR 25/S 1025 is a tax-inclusive rate, as is the current personal income tax, whereas most state-level sales taxes are quoted on a tax-exclusive basis. For ease of comparison, FairTax.org gives the tax rate both ways. Both rates are relevant, since the FairTax is replacing an income tax system, and 23 percent correctly represents the tax burden compared to the current system.

To review some of the research that determined a 23% (inclusive) rate is correct, please read Taxing Sales Under the FairTax: What Rate Works? This paper is a collaborative effort of 5 respected and independent economists.

http://www.fairtax.org/site/News2?news_iv_ctrl=1541&page=NewsArticle&id=8248


311 posted on 05/27/2009 4:43:31 PM PDT by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Protect wrote: “The Dems never believe people respond to their taxes. They always believe in “static” analysis where Revenue = Tax Rates x Income.”

Not true. Democrats believe higher tobacco taxes discourage smoking, and higher gas taxes reduce oil consumption... they just believe higher corporate taxes, sales, taxes and income taxes has no economic effect!


312 posted on 05/27/2009 4:52:43 PM PDT by Reverend Wright ("Bankruptcy is not a sign of weakness.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; bamahead; djsherin

10%???

That’s crazy!

Even under the Liberal government here in Canada we only had 7%.

Now, under the Conservatives, it’s 5%


313 posted on 05/27/2009 5:22:56 PM PDT by fanfan (Why did they bury Barry's past?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

The ONLY spending cuts you will get from the Dims are cuts in defense spending, military pay, and cutting soldiers from the Armed Forces.

Other than that, expect a VAT, a 500%-1000% increase in Federal Gasoline/Diesal fuel taxes, a across the board income tax increase, and forcing the states to increase their income/property/sales/gas taxes to make up the difference in spending.


314 posted on 05/27/2009 5:31:40 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: demoskowitz

No to VAT.


315 posted on 05/27/2009 5:45:39 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

>>“I think a VAT and a high-end income tax have got to be on the table.”<<

>no mention of cutting spending?<

With a socialist who has no genuine credentials just theory as CIC and the biggest bunch of thieves ever to hit capital hill in our history???

YOU HAVE TO BE KIDDING ME RIGHT?


316 posted on 05/27/2009 6:18:59 PM PDT by Munz ("We're all here for you OK? It's a circle of love" Rham Emanuel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
Time will tell. A VAT would KILL the economy of this country.
317 posted on 05/27/2009 7:08:36 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit (Two terms for politicians, one in office, one in jail.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

If these fascist bastards keep going like they have a holy mandate they will find their asses in the minority very soon.

Even freakin Marin County rejected tax increases in last week’s vote in California. I don’t see this getting through without a major backlash against the Dims.


318 posted on 05/27/2009 7:29:54 PM PDT by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

They are running from high State Income Taxes, of which Texas has none and I don’t think Texas property tax is excessive high compared to where they are moving from. Besides, property taxes in Texas are very low on farms. Does not take much to qualify as a farm.


319 posted on 05/27/2009 7:31:20 PM PDT by lolhelp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: demoskowitz

0bama and friends are desperate to make us European state.


320 posted on 05/27/2009 7:37:43 PM PDT by CriticalJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-360 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson