Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuke just has to explode in space to destroy a country
The Heritage Foundation ^ | April 10, 2009 | James Jay Carafano, Ph.D.

Posted on 05/26/2009 5:56:11 PM PDT by LiveFreeOrDieUSA

Sunlight fills the bedroom. It's past 8 a.m., and it's cold. Why didn't the alarm go off? The bathroom lights are out. The house is without power. The battery-operated radio plays nothing but static. The phone is dead. What on earth has happened?

In fact, what happened was not on Earth. It was above it. A nuclear weapon has detonated high over North America, an explosion so far up that neither the flash nor bang disturbed anyone slumbering in darkened bedrooms across the United States. Electrical systems and computers from New York City to San Francisco cease to function. City streets turn into chaos. Fires break out, and no communications are available to send trucks to fight them. The sick and injured perish in overwhelmed, energy-sapped hospitals. Survivors, unable to fill their gas tanks, slowly walk away from the dead zone, unsure where to go or what they will find.

This scenario may sound like the plot of a science-fiction movie, but Bill Graham, former science adviser to President Reagan, says it's a realistic portrayal of what would happen to the United States after a massive electromagnetic pulse from a nuclear explosion.

(Excerpt) Read more at heritage.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: apocalypse; bhonukes; country; emp; heritagefoundation; nuke; nukes; proliferation; tm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last
To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA
An interesting website with executive summary of findings and recommendations along with a more detailed report of the effects of EMP on our infrastructure can be accessed at Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack.
41 posted on 05/26/2009 6:47:52 PM PDT by NoPrisoners ("When in the course of human events...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: richiep

Yes, I read it. I still don’t look at anything quite the same way. Even if the possiblity is remote, it makes sense to at least try to be prepared.

The take away for me was that when things go haywire, like after a natural disaster, we tend to think in terms of hours, days, unfortunately even weeks, for life to get back to normal. Consider the possiblity of years.


42 posted on 05/26/2009 6:50:20 PM PDT by jazminerose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: umgud

Yep, just check all my personal home defense devices (while cleaning them) … not a chip in the bunch. Nor are the self-contained projectiles associated with them computer controlled. Guess I’m safe. ;-)


43 posted on 05/26/2009 6:52:04 PM PDT by doc1019 (Without White Liberal Guilt, Obama would just be another worthless Congress critter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

“Why does every idiot...”
_________________________________

You’re talking about an explosion close to the ground. We’re talking about space buddy. The equivalent of hitting the broadside of a barn... with a rock.


44 posted on 05/26/2009 6:53:17 PM PDT by LiveFreeOrDieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA

http://www.empcommission.org/


45 posted on 05/26/2009 6:53:18 PM PDT by LiveFreeOrDieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

I think you are pretty much correct. I am an EE and have been following this for quite a while. I don’t think small things like computers will get hit, but even if they do no one will care. The problem is that power transmission will be out for a long while. It will destroy the power transformers and other components that support the grid along with some generator facilities. Transformers take a long time to manufacture and replace. I would think in a large EMP event it could be up to a year to get the grid up.

While we are replacing the transformers we will have no electricity, which means no refrigeration. We would be back to the 19th century. This is something hard to imagine in a large city, however, I think it is very real. It will make 9/11 a walk in the park.

At the last IEEE annual meeting I brought this up with a few scientists. The subject of the meeting was the smart grid. There are lots of people pushing spending on the smart grid. At the same time there seems to be very little understanding of EMP and how dangerous it is. The response I got was that if this happens we are screwed.

It is possible to rework the system, at a cost, to protect the grid. Who would pay for the upgrade? Power systems are utilities or privately owned. I hate to say it but this will have to happen before anyone will pay attention. In the mean time as the guy said, we are screwed.


46 posted on 05/26/2009 6:53:19 PM PDT by Dennis M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA

Give up, America!

Quit!

You cannot exist if we have even ONE nuke!

So you have 2400 big warheads and a few thousand small ones- we will defeat you with merely ONE!

Give up, don’t fight, surrender to our EMP threat!

Your puny technology is useless! Don’t build defenses!

(believe our propaganda!)


47 posted on 05/26/2009 6:53:22 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA

This is why my Ham radio, computer, and 1200 watt TEOTWAWKI generator live in a Faraday cage.


48 posted on 05/26/2009 6:54:36 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA

The US nuclear forces are hardened to resist EMP and submarine launched nukes would be immune to EMP. We thus we could massively retaliate against any nation that perpetrated such an attack against the US. However, the current occupant of the White House might just as well surrender.


49 posted on 05/26/2009 6:56:00 PM PDT by The Great RJ (chain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

It would take out a BUNCH of satellites. No GPS. (No DirecTV.) The military and the rest of us rely heavily on satellite communications these days.

Some power disruptions would be a big problem for city folks and the unprepared.

EMP would certainly be part of an assault against CONUS, but I can’t imagine who would have the balls to start something like that. I know that our nukes are EMP-hardened, so the counterstrike would be massive.

In any case, it pays to be prepared with good stores and self-defense options.


50 posted on 05/26/2009 6:56:57 PM PDT by Rio (Don't make me come over there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA
I understand the concept of EMP’s but why didn't this happen when we had above ground test in Nevada? Oh wait - I get it - NO CHIPS... We didn't have any chips back then... or not many. Anyone?
51 posted on 05/26/2009 6:58:03 PM PDT by GOPJ (A person who will ask you to lie FOR them - will ask other to lie AGAINST you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lafroste
Most Military hardware and Facilities are Hardened against EMP but your civilian facilities are not because it would be cost prohibitive to do it.

Just Imagine trying to harden every Cell phone and Cell Phone network,as well as every P.C. that's running in every business in the U.S.

Near impossible to harden all of those things.

52 posted on 05/26/2009 6:58:26 PM PDT by puppypusher (The world is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Why does every idiot fall for the idea that one nuke can destroy, nay evaporate, entire countries?

No one is saying this. They are talking about EMP (Electromagnetic Pulse), which can cause the internal destruction of electronic and electrical devices. Not talking about destroying buildings, houses, people. Read about it here: http://www.fas.org/nuke/intro/nuke/emp.htm>

53 posted on 05/26/2009 6:59:39 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault ( Obama, you're off the island!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA

Yeah? And they thought, testing the first Atomic bomb, could ignite the entire atmosphere and burn the earth up...

This one needs to be filed in the fantasy file, right next to the Global Warming fantasy file.


54 posted on 05/26/2009 6:59:54 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tonytitan

Yes, it would take a 10 Mt nuke, not a 20 kt one (like NK just detonated).


55 posted on 05/26/2009 7:02:54 PM PDT by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper

“This one needs to be filed in the fantasy file, right next to the Global Warming fantasy file.”
_______________________________________________

I wish you were right, but this is very, very real. unfortunately.


56 posted on 05/26/2009 7:05:41 PM PDT by LiveFreeOrDieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Congratulations, you've just demonstrated that you have no idea what an EMP strike is.

I see opinions go both ways on the danger, but it looks to me like the ones saying it is a real threat have a little better handle on the facts. I'm hopeful that more equipment would survive than the pessimists think, but worst case, the total loss of electronic infrastructure (or close to it) would create an incredible catastrophe. Coupled with other EMP strikes in nations that would be expected to launch major relief efforts (as in the online book Lights Out) and I would not be surprised to see 50-90% mortality nationwide in the first couple years. After that things would even out and we'd start to claw ourselves back out of the 19th century.

57 posted on 05/26/2009 7:05:49 PM PDT by Liberty1970 (Democrats are not in control. God is. And Thank God for that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: lafroste
Not wanting to be a kill-joy, but I think US infrastructure is a bit tougher than a single nuke in orbit.

ditto - my thoughts exactly. It would be some nuke to take down everything from coast-to-coast. I believe other indications would have been noted in that scenario.

58 posted on 05/26/2009 7:10:16 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lafroste

And most of them are in Washington, D.C.


59 posted on 05/26/2009 7:10:34 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Dennis M.

DennisM, do you have any feel for the survivability of cars and similar transportation? What about the same hardware sitting on warehouse shelves? If cars start after an EMP strike, I think we’d muddle through OK with the loss of electricity. It would still be bad (especially in arid areas if they lost water pressure, etc.), but transportation will make a huge difference if it is still widely available. If vehicles could be quickly repaired with off the shelf replacement body computers, etc., that were fried, then at least a portion of the automotive fleet would soon be running again, and that likewise would mitigate the danger.


60 posted on 05/26/2009 7:10:49 PM PDT by Liberty1970 (Democrats are not in control. God is. And Thank God for that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson