Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuke just has to explode in space to destroy a country
The Heritage Foundation ^ | April 10, 2009 | James Jay Carafano, Ph.D.

Posted on 05/26/2009 5:56:11 PM PDT by LiveFreeOrDieUSA

Sunlight fills the bedroom. It's past 8 a.m., and it's cold. Why didn't the alarm go off? The bathroom lights are out. The house is without power. The battery-operated radio plays nothing but static. The phone is dead. What on earth has happened?

In fact, what happened was not on Earth. It was above it. A nuclear weapon has detonated high over North America, an explosion so far up that neither the flash nor bang disturbed anyone slumbering in darkened bedrooms across the United States. Electrical systems and computers from New York City to San Francisco cease to function. City streets turn into chaos. Fires break out, and no communications are available to send trucks to fight them. The sick and injured perish in overwhelmed, energy-sapped hospitals. Survivors, unable to fill their gas tanks, slowly walk away from the dead zone, unsure where to go or what they will find.

This scenario may sound like the plot of a science-fiction movie, but Bill Graham, former science adviser to President Reagan, says it's a realistic portrayal of what would happen to the United States after a massive electromagnetic pulse from a nuclear explosion.

(Excerpt) Read more at heritage.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: apocalypse; bhonukes; country; emp; heritagefoundation; nuke; nukes; proliferation; tm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last
Read on and see how the government doesn't give a hoot about this extremely dangerous aspect of a nuclear weapon. They even canceled the MKV (multiple kill vehicle invented by the Missile Defense Agency to shoot down multiple warheads in space)!!!
1 posted on 05/26/2009 5:56:12 PM PDT by LiveFreeOrDieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA

News about 50 years old...


2 posted on 05/26/2009 5:59:14 PM PDT by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA

Not wanting to be a kill-joy, but I think US infrastructure is a bit tougher than a single nuke in orbit.


3 posted on 05/26/2009 6:00:15 PM PDT by lafroste (gravity is not a force. See my profile to read my novel absolutely free (I know, beyond shameless))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA
what country, besides us, has this capability?

russia? china? france?

4 posted on 05/26/2009 6:01:51 PM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA

A nuclear explosion in space will only release prisoners in the Phantom Zone.


5 posted on 05/26/2009 6:02:16 PM PDT by Krankor (iT EMINDS ME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA

This is a theory without a good test. I think the impact of a EMP nuke would destroy some electronics and electrics but not most, and maybe not even more than few percent. I’ve worked in places where we had some much smaller pulses, yet much closer up. Didn’t lose anything except for some CRT browning, and in some places didn’t take and special precautions.


6 posted on 05/26/2009 6:04:37 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Krankor

You can argue about the impact, but there is no doubt that China has or got the technology to build both a neutron bomb and an EMT device. Many pieces of equipment..civilian and military are tested to EMT specs, but no one really knows what the impact might be.
This is one reason a “star wars defense is needed”..even a small nuclear power might figure out how to do this..like N. Korea.


7 posted on 05/26/2009 6:05:28 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA
How big a nuke is required for EMP? Somewhere I read that a rather large nuke is required for region-wide destruction.

Also, they have identified what it would require to harden our grid against EMP or solar "influence"... and it's not a lot. Not that the O will spend a dime for that...

8 posted on 05/26/2009 6:07:04 PM PDT by sionnsar ((Iran Azadi | 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | "Also sprach Telethustra" - NonValueAdded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA

None of my firearms are computer operated. Trust me, they will work.


9 posted on 05/26/2009 6:07:25 PM PDT by umgud (Look to gov't to solve your everday problems and they'll control your everday life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA

Oh goodie, I’ll have a chance to test all my Y2K food!

/sarc


10 posted on 05/26/2009 6:07:51 PM PDT by Travis McGee (--www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA

I think we should test this hypothesis...over Iran.


11 posted on 05/26/2009 6:08:24 PM PDT by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lafroste

Not only that, from what I have read it would take more than a Hiroshima-type fission weapon to do real damage. It would take at least a thermonuclear/fusion device to inflict measurable harm to the contintal US, something with a megaton-class yield. NK and Iran are nowhere close to having that capability.


12 posted on 05/26/2009 6:11:36 PM PDT by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lafroste
Not wanting to be a kill-joy, but I think US infrastructure is a bit tougher than a single nuke in orbit.

Our power grids are pretty fragile. A few years ago, tree branches in Ohio blacked out the entire Northeast from Ontario to NYC. EMP will fry them.

13 posted on 05/26/2009 6:13:36 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA

Anyone interested in this possibility should read “One Second After.” A VG quick read about a community in the US during the year following an EMT attack.


14 posted on 05/26/2009 6:13:47 PM PDT by richiep (Richie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thefactor
what country, besides us, has this capability?

Several countries probably have the capability. I doubt any have the capability of doing it without being able to tell where it came from.

The question is, who has the capability, and doesn't care about the retaliatory strike from the SLBMs that's going to come right after it?

15 posted on 05/26/2009 6:14:37 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Krankor

16 posted on 05/26/2009 6:15:22 PM PDT by jaz.357 (Ars longa, Vita brevis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LiveFreeOrDieUSA

But Obama is president now. Everyone loves us.
The messiah will protect us by being nice to terrorists.


17 posted on 05/26/2009 6:18:08 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lafroste; All

“Not wanting to be a kill-joy, but I think US infrastructure is a bit tougher than a single nuke in orbit.”

No the opposite is true. The more high tech we have become, the more vulnerable to EMP we are. We have known about the effects of EMP since high altitude tests were done in the early 60s in the Pacific. The “Teak” test was, I believe, over 500 miles away from Hawaii, but when this “in space” explosion occured it blew out power in Hawaii. This was the more rugged technology of that day. By the 70s the concern over EMP had grown so that a DoD publication in the late 70s said that a 1 megaton burst 200 miles above the continental U.S. would blanket the entire mainland with EMP that would be extremely disruptive. That was in the “transistor” days. Now that we are in the micro transistor times the danger is much, much greater. That same burst would paralize the entire 48 contiguous states. There would be zero communications, no power, no internet, nada. Only EMP shielded equipment would survive. This would be some military things, that’s about it.

Such an EMP attack would probably precede a conventional one.


18 posted on 05/26/2009 6:20:59 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tonytitan

Are you sure they don’t have that capability?


19 posted on 05/26/2009 6:21:38 PM PDT by LiveFreeOrDieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

“I think we should test this hypothesis...over Iran.”
____________________________________________________

Haha, there is nothing to test there, just tents and goats?


20 posted on 05/26/2009 6:21:38 PM PDT by LiveFreeOrDieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson